Author: Rich Pav

  • Creating an ADHD Life Management System in n8n

    Creating an ADHD Life Management System in n8n

    I’m creating a comprehensive automated life management system using n8n to help manage my ADHD and autism. This system will serve as a virtual executive function assistant, helping me organize tasks, manage time, prioritize effectively, and overcome executive function challenges that have significantly impacted my life.

    Core Problem I’m Addressing

    As an adult with ADHD and autism, I struggle with:

    • Task initiation and completion
    • Prioritization (spending too much time on unimportant but novel tasks)
    • Time management and awareness
    • Project follow-through (getting stuck in perpetual planning/learning loops)
    • Financial management (particularly sending invoices)
    • Overwhelming feelings when faced with large task lists
    • Rejection sensitivity dysphoria that prevents important actions
    • Difficulty maintaining regular routines and habits

    Despite having skills and capabilities, these executive function challenges have created significant barriers to my financial stability and professional success.

    The Workflow Solution

    I’m building an n8n workflow that functions as a 24/7 life coach by:

    1. Centralized Task Management

    • Capturing tasks from multiple input methods (Telegram bot, Obsidian)
    • Storing and organizing them with metadata (deadlines, importance, effort)
    • Breaking large projects into manageable steps
    • Tracking task status and completion history

    2. Intelligent Prioritization System

    • Using Ollama (local AI) to analyze and prioritize tasks based on:
    • Deadlines and time sensitivity
    • Real-world impact and importance
    • My energy patterns and executive function state
    • Implementation of evidence-based ADHD management techniques
    • Helping me focus on what truly matters rather than being diverted by novelty

    3. Dynamic Scheduling and Time Management

    • Integrating with Google Calendar for visual time blocking
    • Creating appropriate work/break schedules based on task demands
    • Implementing buffer time for transitions
    • Sending strategic reminders to leverage the Zeigarnik effect
    • Delivering contextual notifications to my smartwatch at appropriate moments

    4. Behavioral Pattern Analysis

    • Integrating with RescueTime to understand my actual productivity patterns
    • Tracking mood, energy, and focus levels throughout the day
    • Recognizing what strategies are working and what aren’t
    • Adapting recommendations based on empirical data about my behavior

    5. Specialized Workflow Components

    • Invoice Assistant: Automated system to overcome my invoice avoidance
    • Project Completer: Breaking down stalled projects (like my school website) into actionable steps
    • Financial Health Monitor: Tracking income, spending, and financial goals
    • Emotional Regulation Support: Providing CBT/DBT-inspired interventions when needed

    Technical Implementation

    The system utilizes:

    • n8n running in Docker on my M1 Mac for workflow automation
    • Ollama for local AI processing (avoiding privacy concerns and costs of cloud AI)
    • Obsidian for knowledge management and task storage
    • Google Calendar for scheduling
    • Telegram for mobile interaction and notifications
    • RescueTime for activity tracking
    • JavaScript custom functions for personalized logic
    • Webhooks for event-based triggers

    Why This Approach Is Essential

    Traditional task management apps don’t address the specific executive function challenges of ADHD. This custom system:

    1. Removes Decision Fatigue: Tells me exactly what to do when, reducing the paralysis of choice
    2. Provides External Scaffolding: Creates the structure my brain struggles to maintain internally
    3. Leverages Technology: Uses automation to compensate for executive function deficits
    4. Adapts to My Specific Needs: Can be continuously refined based on what works for my particular ADHD presentation
    5. Reduces Cognitive Load: Handles the mental overhead of tracking, prioritizing, and scheduling
    6. Creates Accountability: Provides consistent feedback and monitoring

    This isn’t just about productivity—it’s about creating an external executive function system that compensates for neurological differences. The goal is to build a reliable support structure that allows me to overcome the barriers that have prevented financial stability and professional success, despite having the necessary capabilities.

    By combining current technological tools with evidence-based ADHD management strategies, this n8n workflow aims to provide the consistent structure and support that would otherwise require a live-in human executive function coach.

    Pages: 1 2

  • About adult language learning

    About adult language learning

    This transcript features a conversation between the host, Matt Brooks-Green, and Dr Angelika Kraemer, Director of the Language Resource Center at Cornell University, about adult language learning. Here’s a summary of the key points:

    How Adults Learn Languages:

    • Existing Framework: Adults already have a framework from their first language(s), making the process different from children, who start with a “blank slate.”
    • Motivation & Communication: Adults are often motivated by a desire to communicate, not just learn rules.
    • Experience: Adults draw on communication experiences from various backgrounds and cultures.
    • Similarities & Differences: While the brain functions differently, there are more similarities than differences in how adults and children acquire languages.

    Traditional vs. Modern Methods:

    • Traditional Ineffectiveness: Traditional methods of rote memorization and grammar drills are often ineffective for communication.
    • Goal-Oriented Learning: The best approach depends on individual goals (reading, speaking, etc.).
    • Focus on Communication: Modern approaches prioritize communication and interaction over strict rule-learning.
    • There is value in grammar.
    • Language learners should make mistakes.

    Technology in Language Learning:

    • Increased Access: Technology provides access to a vast range of resources (movies, music, news) and potential communication partners.
    • Gamification: Apps can motivate some learners through gamified approaches (streaks, points).
    • Human Interaction is Key: Technology cannot replace human interaction and immersion in a language and culture.
    • AI Concerns: AI is limited by its data and may not be entirely accurate, requiring fact-checking.
    • Language Availability: Resources are not equally available for all languages, with less commonly taught languages having fewer options.
    • Vet Resources: Learners need to discern between effective and ineffective resources, seeking advice from teachers or experienced individuals.

    Culture’s Role in Language Learning:

    • Culture as a Lens: Culture shapes how language is understood and used.
    • Non-Verbal Communication: Gestures, empathy, and politeness vary across cultures.
    • Humor and Idioms: Humor, sarcasm, and idiomatic expressions are culture-specific and challenging to master.
    • Cross-Cultural Competence: Learning a language fosters respect for different cultures and promotes cross-cultural understanding.
    • Cultural vs. Linguistic Ability: Cultural knowledge is needed.

    Advice for Language Learners:

    • Find a Teacher/Partner: Human interaction is crucial for guidance and practice.
    • Don’t Be Shy: Embrace making mistakes as part of the learning process.
    • Be Patient and Compassionate: Language learning takes time and consistent effort.
    • Regular Exposure: Immerse yourself in the language through various media (music, news).
    • Focus on the Benefits: Remind yourself of the connections and opportunities that language proficiency can create.

    In essence, Dr. Kramer emphasizes that adult language learning is a complex process influenced by individual motivations, goals, and experiences. While technology offers valuable resources, it’s crucial to prioritize human interaction, cultural understanding, and consistent practice.

  • Fifteen lies people with ADHD keep telling themselves

    Fifteen lies people with ADHD keep telling themselves

    1. New Notebook Fallacy
      • Misconception: A new notebook will solve all my organizational issues.
      • Reality: While a new notebook can be motivating, it’s consistent use and established systems that truly help manage ADHD.
    2. Screenshot Delusion
      • Misconception: Taking a screenshot means I can look at it later and retain the information.
      • Reality: Screenshots don’t aid in memory retention; they’re better for quick reference or when you know you’ll revisit the content.
    3. Professional Gear Myth
      • Misconception: Buying top-tier professional gear is necessary for long-term success in a hobby.
      • Reality: What matters most is consistent practice and genuine interest, not the quality of equipment.
    4. Memory Mirage
      • Misconception: I’ll remember this person’s name.
      • Reality: Active recall and repetition are key to remembering names; relying on hope alone isn’t effective.
    5. Lazy Organization
      • Misconception: I’ll put that pile of clothes away later.
      • Reality: Tackling tasks immediately reduces stress and keeps living spaces organized.
    6. Last-Minute Panic
      • Misconception: I’ve got enough time to buy coffee before my train leaves.
      • Reality: Planning ahead and setting reminders can prevent last-minute rushes.
    7. Digital Disarray
      • Misconception: I’ll save this to my desktop now and organize it later.
      • Reality: Regular organization and file management are essential to maintain a clutter-free workspace.
    8. Time Management Illusion
      • Misconception: I’ll be there in five minutes.
      • Reality: Estimating time accurately requires practice and awareness of distractions.
    9. Overcommitment Syndrome
      • Misconception: I can organize two social gatherings in one day and be okay afterwards.
      • Reality: Prioritizing and scheduling events helps avoid overcommitment and stress.
    10. Subscription Surprise
      • Misconception: I’ll remember to cancel that free subscription before my card gets charged.
      • Reality: Setting reminders and reviewing subscriptions regularly prevents unexpected charges.
    11. Tab Troubles
      • Misconception: I definitely need all these tabs open, even though they’re so small and squished together I can’t even read them anymore.
      • Reality: Closing unnecessary tabs improves focus and productivity.
    12. Morning Mayhem
      • Misconception: Thirty minutes is definitely enough time to get ready.
      • Reality: Allocating specific times for morning routines helps ensure punctuality.
    13. Laundry Lag
      • Misconception: I’m going to put the laundry on and empty the machine when it’s finished.
      • Reality: Regularly checking and managing laundry ensures it doesn’t pile up.
    14. Distraction Dilemma
      • Misconception: I’m going to go grab something in the other room and I definitely won’t be distracted by a side quest.
      • Reality: Being aware of potential distractions and setting clear goals helps stay focused.
    15. Habitual Hesitation
      • Misconception: This is the last time I buy another reusable shopping bag.
      • Reality: Consistent habits and planning reduce the likelihood of impulse buys.
  • How to use AI to create a lesson from a single image

    How to use AI to create a lesson from a single image

    A sample lesson is on page two of this post.

    Instructions

    1. Paste the system prompt below into the “System Instructions” text field at https://aistudio.google.com/
    2. Selecting a model on the right. I use “Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental 01-21” or “Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental 02-05” if the thinking model is acting wonky.
    3. Past or upload a photo to the text area at the bottom of the page, the same place where you type your commands.
    4. Tell it the CEFR level for the lesson (CEFR A1, A2, B1, B2, C1 or C2). For example:
    Don't assume the students are small children. They can be JHS or HS students, or adults. Create a CEFR A2 lesson.

    The System Prompt

    (It’s a good read too. It’s useful instructions for how to create a lesson even if you don’t use AI.)

    # CEFR-Based EFL Photo Description Lesson Generator
    
    ## Purpose and Scope
    
    You are an expert EFL (English as a Foreign Language) curriculum developer specializing in creating educational blog posts from photo descriptions. Your role is to transform complex descriptions of photographs into structured, level-appropriate English lessons for Japanese learners, organized according to CEFR proficiency levels (A1-C2).
    
    Your primary functions are to:
    
    1. Analyze photo descriptions to extract relevant vocabulary and language points
    2. Adapt content to match specific CEFR proficiency levels
    3. Create complete, printable blog post lessons with appropriate activities
    4. Provide supplementary teaching recommendations
    
    This system addresses the needs of EFL instructors teaching Japanese-speaking students who want to transform visual content into comprehensive language lessons.
    
    ## Requirements and Process
    
    ### Initial Analysis
    
    1. Parse the provided photo description thoroughly
    2. Extract key vocabulary items relevant to the image description:
        - Objects, people, actions, colors, emotions, spatial relationships
        - Clothing, facial features, environmental elements, artistic qualities
        - Technical terms related to photography when relevant
    
    ### Adaptation Process by CEFR Level
    
    For each proficiency level, adapt content as follows:
    
    #### CEFR A1 (Beginner)
    
    - Simplify vocabulary to most basic terms (nouns, common adjectives, basic verbs)
    - Use present simple tense predominantly
    - Keep sentences short (5-8 words)
    - Provide Japanese translations for ALL instructions and vocabulary items
    - Focus on concrete, visible elements in the photo
    - Use mostly SVO sentence structures
    - Include picture-based activities and simple fill-in-the-blank exercises
    
    #### CEFR A2 (Elementary)
    
    - Introduce more descriptive vocabulary (basic adjectives, common adverbs)
    - Incorporate present continuous and simple past tenses
    - Use sentences of 8-12 words with basic conjunctions (and, but, or)
    - Provide Japanese translations for all instructions and key vocabulary
    - Include writing and speaking activities with scaffolding
    - Add matching exercises and guided discussion questions
    
    #### CEFR B1 (Intermediate)
    
    - Introduce more nuanced descriptive vocabulary
    - Incorporate a wider range of tenses and some modal verbs
    - Use compound sentences and simple complex sentences
    - Provide Japanese translations only for advanced vocabulary
    - Include more creative writing activities and role-plays
    - Add discussion questions requiring opinions
    - Include paragraph-writing tasks
    
    #### CEFR B2 (Upper Intermediate)
    
    - Utilize more specialized and nuanced vocabulary
    - Incorporate conditionals and passive voice
    - Use complex sentences with relative clauses and subordination
    - Provide Japanese translations only for technical or specialized terms
    - Include debate topics and argumentative writing tasks
    - Add critical thinking questions about composition and meaning
    - Incorporate language analysis activities
    
    #### CEFR C1 (Advanced)
    
    - Use advanced, precise vocabulary including idiomatic expressions
    - Incorporate all tense forms, conditionals, and complex structures
    - Use sophisticated sentence structures with varied rhythm
    - Provide minimal Japanese translations (only for highly technical terms)
    - Include creative content creation and analytical exercises
    - Add rhetorical analysis of descriptive techniques
    - Incorporate stylistic comparison activities
    
    #### CEFR C2 (Proficiency)
    
    - Use sophisticated, nuanced vocabulary including field-specific terminology
    - Incorporate all grammatical structures with emphasis on subtlety and precision
    - Use varied, complex sentence structures reflecting native-like competence
    - Provide no Japanese translations
    - Include content creation, critical analysis, and evaluation
    - Add scholarly discussion questions about cultural/artistic significance
    - Incorporate advanced linguistic analysis activities
    
    ### Integration of EFL Methodologies
    
    Incorporate the following methodologies based on CEFR level:
    
    - **A1-A2**: Primarily use Krashen's Comprehensible Input and Total Physical Response
    - **A2-B1**: Add Communicative Language Teaching and Lexical Approach
    - **B1-B2**: Incorporate Task-Based Language Learning and Content-Based Instruction
    - **B2-C2**: Add Critical Thinking Approach and Academic Language Development
    
    ### Integration of Authentic Communication
    
    For each lesson, ensure meaningful communication opportunities:
    - A1-A2: Include simple information gap activities and personalization questions
    - B1-B2: Add real-world scenarios where learners need to describe visual elements
    - C1-C2: Incorporate negotiation of meaning and intercultural communication tasks
    
    Each lesson must include at least one authentic communication activity where learners exchange information they genuinely don't know.
    
    ### Pronunciation Guidance
    
    Include targeted pronunciation notes focusing on:
    - A1-A2: Individual sounds challenging for Japanese speakers (r/l, th, v/b, etc.)
    - B1-B2: Word stress patterns and linking
    - C1-C2: Intonation patterns and prosodic features
    
    Format pronunciation guidance as:
    - IPA transcription when helpful (unnecessary for A1-A2)
    - Explicit comparison with Japanese phonology
    - Simple practice activities (minimal pairs, tongue twisters)
    
    ### Japanese-Specific Learning Considerations
    
    For each lesson, address specific linguistic challenges for Japanese learners:
    - Phonological Challenges: Target specific sound contrasts (r/l, b/v, th)
    - Grammatical Patterns: Highlight areas where Japanese and English differ substantially
    
    For pronunciation guidance, include specific mouth position descriptions and katakana approximations where helpful.
    
    ### Lesson Timing Guidelines
    
    For each lesson, include suggested timing for each activity:
    - A1-A2 lessons: Total duration 45-60 minutes
    - B1-B2 lessons: Total duration 60-90 minutes
    - C1-C2 lessons: Total duration 90-120 minutes
    
    For each activity component, provide an estimated time allocation in parentheses. For example:
    - Vocabulary Introduction (10 minutes)
    - Grammar Explanation (15 minutes)
    - Practice Activities (20 minutes)
    
    ### Visual Support Requirements
    
    Since lessons are based on photographs, provide clear instructions for when and how to use the image:
    - Initial presentation: Specify when to first show the image (e.g., before or after vocabulary introduction)
    - Visual scaffolding: Suggest using annotations, highlighting, or zooming techniques for specific activities
    - Alternative visuals: Recommend supplementary images that support the learning objectives
    
    For each activity that directly references the photograph, indicate:
    - [SHOW PHOTO] at appropriate points in instructions
    - Guidance on directing student attention to specific elements
    - Options for presenting the image (projected, printed handouts, digital devices)
    
    ## Output Format Specifications
    
    ### Blog Post Structure
    
    Each blog post must include:
    
    1. **Title**: "[Level-appropriate engaging title in English] ([Japanese translation of title])"
    2. **Introduction**: Brief context about the photo (1-2 paragraphs, complexity matching CEFR level)
    3. **Vocabulary Section**: Presented as:
        - A1-A2: Word lists with translations, pictures, and example sentences
        - B1-B2: Thematic groupings with contextual examples
        - C1-C2: Sophisticated lexical sets with collocations and register information
    4. **Description Section**: Model texts describing the photo at appropriate level
    5. **Grammar Focus**: One relevant grammar point extracted from the description
       - Include controlled practice exercises with increasing complexity
       - Provide sentence frames/stems for guided practice
       - Add error correction activities targeting common L1 interference
       - For A1-B1: Include visual grammar charts with examples. Use Markdown to create the charts.
    6. **Activities Section**: Level-appropriate exercises (minimum 3 activities)
    7. **Production Task**: Final task requiring learners to produce language
    8. **Listening Component**: Level-appropriate listening activities:
       - A1-A2: Simple dictation or identification activities
       - B1-B2: Gap-fill or comprehension questions based on photo description
       - C1-C2: Critical listening tasks involving detailed analysis
    9. **Additional Resources**: Suggestions for expansion (optional)
    
    The instructor can create voice over audio files to embed in the lesson, so in the output, include the dialog to be recorded.
    
    ### Grammar Explanation Requirements
    
    Grammar explanations must:
    - Include visual representation (charts, diagrams) using Markdown formatting
    - Provide explicit L1/L2 comparison relevant to Japanese speakers
    - Offer graduated practice (from controlled to free production)
    - Address common errors specific to Japanese learners
    
    For A1-A2 levels, include simplified conceptual explanations with Japanese translations of grammatical terms.
    
    ### Grammar Exercise Quality Requirements
    
    Ensure all grammar practice activities:
    1. Demonstrate authentic purpose for the target structure
    2. Progress logically from recognition to production
    3. Use examples that genuinely illustrate the grammar point's function
    
    For example activities:
    - Sentence combining must involve semantically related sentences where the grammar structure creates a meaningful relationship
    - Error correction must contain plausible errors that Japanese speakers would make
    - Practice examples should show clear communication advantages of using the target structure
    
    Before finalizing any grammar activity, verify that it demonstrates the actual communicative purpose of the grammar point rather than mechanical manipulation.
    
    ### Vocabulary Recycling Requirements
    
    Ensure deliberate vocabulary recycling:
    - Each key vocabulary item must appear in at least 4 different contexts/activities
    - Create a vocabulary progression (receptive → controlled productive → free productive)
    - For A1-B1: Include explicit vocabulary review activities
    - For B2-C2: Add collocation and register awareness activities
    
    Include a vocabulary map showing how key terms connect to previously learned vocabulary.
    
    ### Digital Integration Requirements
    
    Each lesson should include at least one explicit digital component created with H5P:
    - A1-A2: Simple interactive flashcards, digital picture dictionaries, or audio recordings
    - B1-B2: Interactive quizzes, digital storytelling opportunities, or multimedia presentations
    - C1-C2: Collaborative online projects, digital analysis tools, or multimedia creation tasks
    
    Specify how digital tools enhance language acquisition rather than simply digitizing traditional activities.
    
    ### Multimodal Learning Integration
    
    Incorporate activities that engage multiple sensory channels to enhance retention:
    - A1-A2: Include TPR (Total Physical Response) activities with physical movements representing key vocabulary
    - B1-B2: Add audio-visual tasks requiring integration of listening and visual processing
    - C1-C2: Incorporate multimedia analysis requiring simultaneous processing of visual, audio, and textual information
    
    Each lesson should include at least one activity for each learning modality:
    - Visual: Image analysis, color-coding, mind mapping
    - Auditory: Listening tasks, pronunciation practice, discussions
    - Kinesthetic: Role-play, mime, physical arrangement activities
    - Reading/Writing: Text analysis, creative writing, note-taking strategies
    
    ### Assessment Framework
    
    For each production task, include:
    - Clear success criteria appropriate to CEFR level
    - Sample "strong" response to illustrate expectations
    - Simple rubric with 2-3 assessment dimensions
    - Self-assessment questions for learners
    
    ### Enhanced Assessment Framework
    
    For each production task:
    - Provide specific descriptors for each assessment dimension (e.g., "Uses 5+ target vocabulary items correctly" rather than "Good vocabulary use")
    - Include both analytic (component skills) and holistic (overall impression) assessment criteria
    - Add peer assessment opportunities with guided feedback forms
    - Create achievement badges or milestone markers for motivation
    
    Include concrete indicators for teachers to recognize when learning objectives have been met, such as:
    - "Students can correctly use 3-4 participle clauses in their production task"
    - "Students can identify and explain the focal point of a photograph using appropriate terminology"
    
    ### Formative Assessment Integration
    
    Each lesson must include structured assessment opportunities:
    - Pre-assessment: Quick activity to gauge existing knowledge of target vocabulary/grammar
    - Process-assessment: Check-in points throughout the lesson with clear success criteria
    - Post-assessment: Simple, measurable way to evaluate learning against lesson objectives
    
    Include a teacher guide section with indicators of successful acquisition and intervention strategies for common errors.
    
    ### Cognitive Engagement Requirements
    
    Each lesson must include activities at multiple cognitive levels:
    - Remembering/Understanding: Basic recall of vocabulary or concepts
    - Applying/Analyzing: Using language in new contexts or examining language patterns
    - Evaluating/Creating: Making judgments or producing original content
    
    Activities should progressively move from lower to higher order thinking skills, appropriate to the CEFR level.
    
    ### Real-World Application Requirements
    
    Each lesson must include explicit connection to real-world language use:
    - A1-A2: Simple role plays simulating basic real-life interactions
    - B1-B2: Tasks mirroring authentic communication needs (describing photos to friends, reporting observations)
    - C1-C2: Professional or academic scenarios requiring sophisticated description
    
    Include "Why this matters" explanations for activities to help learners see the relevance to their language learning goals.
    
    ### Intercultural Competence Development
    
    For each lesson, especially for higher levels (B1-C2):
    - Identify opportunities to develop intercultural awareness through photo analysis
    - Include discussion questions about cultural perspectives on the subject matter
    - Encourage reflection on how cultural background influences perception of images
    - Add activities comparing Japanese and English ways of describing similar scenes
    
    For B2-C2 levels, incorporate specific intercultural communication development:
    - Cultural connotations of descriptive language
    - Cultural differences in visual composition preferences
    - Analysis of culture-specific reactions to similar visual stimuli
    
    ### Enhanced Error Anticipation and Correction
    
    For each target grammar point and key vocabulary set:
    1. Identify 3-5 most likely error patterns specific to Japanese learners
    2. Create targeted practice activities addressing these predicted errors
    3. Provide teacher notes on how to effectively correct these errors
    4. Include awareness-raising activities that help students recognize their own error patterns
    
    For example:
    - Article usage with uncountable nouns: "The nature is beautiful in this photo" → "Nature is beautiful in this photo"
    - Adjective order: "The blue big sky" → "The big blue sky"
    - Verb tense in descriptions: "The person wearing a hat and smiled" → "The person wearing a hat and smiling"
    
    ### Cultural Context Integration
    
    For each lesson, especially when teaching Japanese learners:
    - Research and include culturally relevant connections between the photo subject and Japanese culture
    - For A1-A2: Simple cultural facts with bilingual presentation
    - For B1-B2: Compare/contrast cultural perspectives related to the image
    - For C1-C2: Deeper analysis of cultural symbolism and cross-cultural interpretations
    
    ### Blog Post Formatting
    
    - Use clear Markdown formatting for printability
    - Include headers, subheaders, and bullet points for readability
    - Set off vocabulary items in tables where appropriate
    - Use emphasis for key terms
    - Create visually distinct sections with horizontal rules
    - Use consistent formatting for translations (Japanese in parentheses)
    - Include placeholders for images with descriptive captions
    
    ## Example Outputs
    
    ### Example 1: CEFR A1 Blog Post Format
    
    ```
    # Let's Learn English with a Special Photo! (特別な写真で英語を学びましょう!)
    
    Hello! Today we will look at a photo and learn some English words.
    
    ## Important Words (重要な単語)
    - **person** (人) - Someone in the photo
    - **smile** (笑顔) - When someone looks happy
    - **hat** (帽子) - Something you wear on your head
    - **blue** (青い) - A color like the sky
    
    ## Let's Make Sentences! (文章を作りましょう!)
    1. I see a person.
    2. The person has a hat.
    3. The hat is blue.
    4. The person has a smile.
    
    ## Your Turn! (あなたの番!)
    Fill in the blanks:
    1. I see a ______.
    2. The person has a ______.
    3. The hat is ______.
    
    ## Fun Activity! (楽しいアクティビティ!)
    Draw your own picture with these things:
    - A person
    - A hat
    - A smile
    
    ## New Words for Next Time (次回の新しい単語)
    - **photo** (写真) - A picture made with a camera
    - **learn** (学ぶ) - To get new knowledge
    - **English** (英語) - The language we are learning
    
    See you next time!
    ```
    
    ### Example 2: CEFR B2 Blog Post Format
    
    ```
    # Analyzing Visual Narratives: Composition Elements in Portrait Photography
    
    This week, we're examining a compelling portrait photograph to develop our descriptive language skills and critical analysis abilities.
    
    ## Key Vocabulary
    | Term | Definition | Example |
    |------|------------|---------|
    | composition | The arrangement of visual elements in an image | "The composition draws attention to the subject's eyes" |
    | juxtaposition | Placing contrasting elements side by side | "The juxtaposition of light and shadow creates drama" |
    | focal point | The center of interest in an image | "The hands form a secondary focal point" |
    | texture | The surface quality of an object | "The leather jacket's texture contrasts with the skin" |
    
    *Note: Only specialized terms will include Japanese translations*
    
    ## Photo Analysis
    The photograph utilizes several compositional techniques to create visual impact. The subject's face is partially obscured, creating a sense of mystery while drawing attention to the exposed features. The high contrast lighting enhances textural elements while establishing a dramatic mood.
    
    The positioning of the hands serves multiple purposes: framing the face, creating a barrier between subject and viewer, and adding geometric elements to the composition.
    
    ## Grammar Focus: Participle Phrases for Description
    When describing images, we often use participle phrases to add detail efficiently:
    - "The subject, **wearing** a leather jacket, gazes intensely at the camera."
    - "The photograph, **taken** in black and white, emphasizes contrast over color."
    - "The hands, **positioned** strategically, create a frame for the eyes."
    
    **Practice**: Create three sentences using participle phrases to describe elements in the photograph.
    
    ## Discussion Activities
    1. **Compositional Analysis**: In pairs, discuss how the photographer uses the following elements:
       - Lighting
       - Framing
       - Texture
       - Contrast
    
    2. **Creative Interpretation**: What story does this image tell? Write a 150-word narrative inspired by the photograph.
    
    3. **Technical Evaluation**: What photographic techniques contribute to the image's impact? How might the image change if shot in color?
    
    ## Extended Production Task
    Choose one option:
    1. Write a 250-word critical analysis of the photograph's composition and emotional impact
    2. Create a detailed description of how you would recreate a similar portrait, explaining your technical and artistic choices
    3. Compare this photograph to another portrait from a different era, analyzing differences in style and technique
    
    ## Further Exploration
    Research the photographer's other works and analyze recurring themes or techniques in their portfolio.
    ```
    
    ## Additional Activities Recommendations
    
    For each CEFR level, recommend 2-3 supplementary activities beyond the blog post content:
    
    ### A1-A2 Recommendations
    
    - Picture dictionaries for theme-related vocabulary
    - Simple role-plays using target vocabulary
    - Matching games with images and words
    - Simplified song lyrics containing target vocabulary
    - Basic dialogues practicing descriptive language
    
    ### B1-B2 Recommendations
    
    - Guided photo analysis of similar images
    - Photography-based projects with written descriptions
    - Interview activities about personal photographs
    - Presentation activities describing cultural images
    - Vocabulary notebooks with collocations and examples
    
    ### C1-C2 Recommendations
    
    - Research projects on photography styles or artists
    - Critical essays comparing different visual media
    - Original photography projects with technical descriptions
    - Debates on artistic interpretation or photographic ethics
    - Translation activities for photography-related texts
    
    ### Digital Extensions
    For each CEFR level, include at least one H5P digital activity option:
    - A1-A2: Simple online flashcards or matching games.
    - B1-B2: Interactive quizzes or digital storytelling tools
    - C1-C2: Collaborative online projects or multimedia presentations
    
    Suggest specific H5P tools where appropriate.
    
    ## Differentiation Strategies
    For each lesson, include:
    - Extension activities for faster learners
    - Support activities for struggling learners
    - Alternative approaches for different learning styles (visual, auditory, kinesthetic)
    - Specific accommodations for common learning challenges
    
    ## Handling Potential Issues
    
    ### Incomplete Photo Descriptions
    
    If the provided description lacks sufficient detail:
    
    1. Focus on available elements while maintaining level-appropriate content
    2. Supplement with general vocabulary related to photography
    3. Add creative activities that encourage students to imagine missing details
    
    ### Level Mismatches
    
    If the vocabulary in the description is too complex for the requested CEFR level:
    
    1. Extract and simplify core concepts while maintaining photo integrity
    2. Introduce complex vocabulary as "extension words" for A1-B1 levels
    3. Create scaffolded activities that build toward understanding more complex elements
    
    ### Cultural Sensitivity
    
    When handling photographs with cultural elements:
    
    1. Provide objective, descriptive language without cultural judgment
    2. Include factual context where necessary for understanding
    3. Focus on linguistic analysis rather than cultural interpretation
    
    ## Self-Evaluation Checklist
    
    Before delivering the blog post, verify:
    
    1. **Level Appropriateness**
        - Vocabulary complexity matches specified CEFR level
        - Sentence structure matches specified CEFR level
        - Activity types are appropriate for language proficiency
        - Amount of L1 support (Japanese) is appropriate
    2. **Completeness**
        - All required sections are included
        - Minimum of three distinct activities are provided
        - Clear production task is included
        - Supplementary activity recommendations are provided
    3. **Technical Quality**
        - Markdown formatting is correct and consistent
        - Japanese translations use correct characters
        - Grammar is accurate throughout
        - Instructions are clear and actionable
    4. **Educational Value**
        - Content builds multiple language skills (reading, writing, speaking, listening)
        - Activities progress from receptive to productive
        - Cognitive engagement matches CEFR level
        - Content allows for measurable language development
    
    ## Implementation Parameters
    
    - Response should be a complete, ready-to-use blog post
    - Include 2-3 supplementary activity recommendations after the blog post
    - Appropriate CEFR level label should appear in the title
    - Blog post should be between 500-1500 words depending on CEFR level
    - Higher CEFR levels (B2-C2) should have progressively less Japanese translation
    - Maintain printable format with clear section breaks
    - All activities should be self-contained with clear instructions
    
    When responding to a user request, analyze the photo description first, extract key vocabulary and themes, then create the level-appropriate blog post following the structures outlined above. Always conclude with supplementary activity recommendations.

    Pages: 1 2 3

  • Psychology of Language Learning

    Psychology of Language Learning

    Psychology of Language Learning

    • Dr. Sarah Mercer, a leading expert in language learning psychology, shares insights on the role of psychology in language learning.
    • She emphasizes the importance of mindset, emotions, and motivation in language learning.
    • Fixed mindset (believing abilities are innate) vs. growth mindset (believing abilities can be developed) impacts language learning.
    • People with growth mindsets are more likely to persist, try harder, and explore strategies to reach their goals.

    Causes of Language Learning Blockades

    • People may have fixed mindsets, leading to self-imposed mental barriers.
    • Emotions like fear and frustration can hinder language learning.
    • Lack of self-efficacy (belief in one’s ability to learn) can cause blockades.

    Overcoming Language Learning Blockades

    • Change mindset: Embrace a growth mindset and believe in one’s ability to learn.
    • Set realistic goals, overcome fears, and celebrate small victories.
    • Document progress and use resources that show gradual improvement.
    • Practice self-compassion and self-encouragement.

    Self-Efficacy in Language Learning

    • Self-efficacy (belief in one’s ability to learn) is crucial for language learning success.
    • It influences motivation, effort, and resilience in the face of challenges.
    • People with higher self-efficacy are more likely to persist and succeed in language learning.

    Emotions in Language Learning

    • Emotions play a significant role in language learning and communication.
    • Fear, anxiety, and stress can hinder language learning, while positive emotions can enhance it.
    • Positive emotions make people more open, creative, and willing to take risks.
    • Barbara Fredrickson’s ‘broaden-and-build’ theory explains how positive emotions expand one’s resources and promote growth.

    Wohlbefinden (Well-being) in Language Learning

    • Wohlbefinden (well-being) is important for language learning success.
    • Stress, pressure, and lack of intrinsic motivation can hinder learning.
    • Positive emotions, social connections, and a sense of purpose facilitate language learning.
    • The process of learning a language can also enhance well-being by fostering social connections and cognitive stimulation.

    Tips for Long-term Language Learning Success

    • Find your passion and maintain intrinsic motivation.
    • Celebrate small victories and progress.
    • Keep your goals in mind and visualize using the language in the future.
    • Be patient and persistent; language learning is a marathon, not a sprint.
    • Connect with others learning the language for social support and motivation.
    • Believe in yourself, focus on your progress, and stay tuned for improvement.
    • Apply the language in imagined situations and celebrate successful implementation.
  • 10 Language Learning Do’s and Don’ts

    10 Language Learning Do’s and Don’ts

    1. 🚫 Don’t: Get stuck on long lists of vocabulary or grammar rules. Instead, focus on using the language in context.

    Memorizing vocabulary lists or drilling grammar rules aligns with learning (conscious knowledge), not acquisition (subconscious competence). True language acquisition happens through comprehensible input—exposure to meaningful, contextualized language. Focus on messages you understand, not isolated words or rules.

    2. ✅ Do: Enjoy the learning process; it should be fun and engaging.

    The Affective Filter Hypothesis states that anxiety, stress, or boredom create a mental barrier to acquisition. When learning is enjoyable, the filter lowers, allowing input to reach the “language acquisition device.” Fun is not a luxury—it’s a necessity.

    3. 🚫 Don’t: Constantly ask “How quickly can I learn?” Instead, prioritize enjoying the journey.

    Language acquisition is gradual and subconscious. Obsessing over speed creates pressure, raising the affective filter. Trust that consistent, compelling input will lead to progress. The “din in the head” (when language sticks) happens organically.

    4. ✅ Do: Focus on improving your overall level in the language to handle various scenarios and topics.

    Broad exposure to diverse contexts ensures a robust foundation. Specializing too early limits the variety of input, which is critical for flexible competence. Comprehensible input across topics builds implicit grammar and vocabulary networks.

    5. 🚫 Don’t: Master specific scenarios or scripts as a shortcut; it distracts from genuine progress.

    Scripted interactions (e.g., memorizing “restaurant phrases”) may help temporarily but don’t foster true acquisition. They bypass the subconscious process of internalizing language through input. Focus on understanding, not performance.

    6. ✅ Do: Practice speaking with many different people about various subjects to boost confidence.

    Speaking is the result of acquisition, not the cause. However, low-pressure interaction provides comprehensible input (via listening) and builds confidence, lowering the affective filter. Avoid forced output—speak when ready, not out of obligation.

    7. 🚫 Don’t: Test yourself unless necessary (e.g., for work or university entrance). Pressure and self-doubt hinder learning.

    Tests measure learning, not acquisition. They often prioritize explicit knowledge (e.g., grammar rules), creating stress that heightens the affective filter. Only test when mandatory; otherwise, let comprehension guide you.

    8. ✅ Do: Use understanding during listening and conversations as the real test of your skills.

    This aligns perfectly with the Input Hypothesis. If you understand the message, your brain is acquiring the language. Comprehension—not test scores—is the true indicator of progress.

    9. 🚫 Don’t: Study long lists of words, especially for tests like TOEFL, as it’s ineffective and unhelpful for long-term improvement.

    Cramming lists for tests promotes short-term memorization, not acquisition. Words stick best when encountered repeatedly in meaningful contexts (e.g., reading, conversations). Prioritize input over rote memorization.

    10. ✅ Do: Give yourself credit for what you can do; remember successes rather than failures to maintain confidence and motivation.

    Celebrating progress reduces anxiety and reinforces motivation—key for lowering the affective filter. Language acquisition thrives in a positive, encouraging environment.

    Final Thoughts
    Language acquisition isn’t about hustling harder. It’s about engaging with compelling input, staying relaxed, and trusting the subconscious process. Ditch the flashcards, find stories you love, and let your brain do the rest.

  • Creating Effective Learning Outcomes for EFL Classrooms

    Creating Effective Learning Outcomes for EFL Classrooms

    Creating clear, actionable learning outcomes is an important part of effective language instruction. When developing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) courses, instructors need to be clear about what language competencies learners should develop after completing each lesson, unit, or course.

    Learning outcomes also play a key role in language assessment and evaluation, making clear what linguistic knowledge and communicative abilities learners should have upon completion of the learning activity.

    A well-written EFL learning outcome will focus on how the learner will be able to apply their new language knowledge in authentic communication contexts, rather than on a learner being able to merely recite grammar rules or vocabulary lists.

    After reading this guide, you will understand the best way to set clear, actionable learning outcomes specifically for language acquisition, and how to write them to improve instruction and assessment within your EFL classroom.

    Discover:

    • What are language learning outcomes?
    • 5 types of language learning outcomes
    • Language learning outcomes vs language learning objectives
    • Examples of language learning objectives and outcomes
    • EFL learning outcomes examples
    • How to write effective language learning outcomes
    • Language learning outcomes verbs
    • How to set effective learning outcomes for different EFL contexts: From beginners to advanced learners
    • Aligning outcomes with CEFR levels
    • Integrating the four language skills into learning outcomes

    What are language learning outcomes?

    Language learning outcomes are descriptions of the specific linguistic knowledge, communicative skills, or cultural competencies that the learner will develop from a language learning activity, such as a lesson, unit, or course.

    Language learning outcomes are measurable achievements that the learner will be able to demonstrate after the learning is complete, which helps language learners understand what they’ll gain from their engagement with the learning activity and how it contributes to their overall language proficiency.

    The most useful EFL learning outcomes include a verb that describes an observable language action, a description of what the learner will be able to communicate and under which conditions they will be able to do it, and the proficiency level they should be able to reach.

    5 types of language learning outcomes

    Types of language learning outcomesDescription
    1. Linguistic competenceWith this type of learning outcome, the learner will understand and use grammar structures, vocabulary, pronunciation, and other formal aspects of the English language.
    2. Sociolinguistic competenceIn this type of learning outcome, the learner recognizes and produces language appropriate to different situations, considering factors like formality, politeness, and cultural context.
    3. Discourse competenceThis type of learning outcome is when the learner is able to create coherent spoken or written texts in English, using cohesive devices and organizational patterns effectively.
    4. Strategic competenceThis category is concerned with the learner’s ability to overcome communication breakdowns through strategies like circumlocution, paraphrasing, or clarification requests.
    5. Intercultural competenceThis is the learner’s ability to navigate cultural differences, understand cultural references, and adapt their communication accordingly when using English with people from diverse backgrounds.

    Language learning outcomes vs. Language learning objectives: What’s the difference?

    Language learning outcomes and language learning objectives are often used interchangeably, but understanding their distinction is crucial for effective EFL curriculum design and lesson planning.

    The following breakdown offers insights into how these concepts relate, with examples that are relevant specifically to language teaching contexts.

    Instructor’s intent vs. Learner’s experience

    • Language learning objective: The intent behind creating a language learning activity, focusing on what the instructor aims to teach.
      Example: This lesson will introduce the present perfect tense and its common time markers.
    • Language learning outcome: The specific language ability that learners gain as a result of the activity.
      Example: Learners can correctly use the present perfect tense to discuss their life experiences and recent activities.

    Purpose vs. Outcome

    • Language learning objective: Expresses the purpose of a language learning experience and the anticipated focus of instruction.
      Example: This class will explain and practice common phrasal verbs related to business communication.
    • Language learning outcome: Describes what language learners are equipped to do after completing the learning experience.
      Example: Learners can identify and appropriately use business-related phrasal verbs in workplace correspondence and conversations.

    Forward-looking vs. Reflective

    • Language learning objective: Focuses on what the language lesson aims to accomplish, looking toward future results.
      Example: This lesson will outline strategies for polite disagreement in English.
    • Language learning outcome: Assesses what has been achieved by participants as a result of their engagement in the language learning session.
      Example: Learners can effectively express disagreement in English using culturally appropriate hedging language and polite expressions.

    Intended vs. Demonstrated achievement

    • Language learning objective: Sets the intention of what language points should be covered during the learning activity.
      Example: This lesson will cover five essential conditionals for expressing hypothetical situations.
    • Language learning outcome: Reflects the actual demonstrable language skills achieved by learners.
      Example: Learners can identify and correctly form conditional sentences to express hypothetical situations in spoken and written English.

    Discrete knowledge vs. Holistic skillset

    • Language learning objective: Describes specific language concepts or structures to be covered.
      Example: This lesson will teach vocabulary and expressions for describing trends in business English.
    • Language learning outcome: Emphasizes a broader set of communicative skills that learners can demonstrate consistently.
      Example: Learners can confidently analyze and describe upward and downward trends in graphs and charts using appropriate business English vocabulary.

    Examples of language learning objectives and language learning outcomes

    • Activity: A beginner EFL lesson on introductions
      Language learning objective: This lesson will teach basic self-introduction expressions and personal information questions.

    Language learning outcome: Learners can introduce themselves, provide basic personal information, and ask others similar questions using appropriate pronunciation and intonation.

    This type of learning outcome deals with both linguistic and sociolinguistic competence. The learner can apply new language in a meaningful communicative context.

    • Activity: An intermediate class on English email writing
      Language learning objective: This class will teach formal email structures and expressions for professional correspondence.

    Language learning outcome: Learners can compose well-structured formal emails using appropriate opening and closing expressions, making requests politely, and organizing information logically.

    This type of learning outcome measures discourse competence, as learners are able to create cohesive written texts for authentic purposes.

    • Activity: An advanced conversation class on handling communication breakdowns
      Language learning objective: This session will cover strategies for maintaining conversation when facing vocabulary limitations.

    Language learning outcome: Learners can effectively use circumlocution, paraphrasing, and clarification requests to navigate communication challenges when lacking specific vocabulary.

    This type of learning outcome deals with strategic competence. The learner can overcome linguistic limitations to maintain successful communication.

    • Activity: A role-play focused on job interviews
      Language learning objective: Session will demonstrate appropriate language and behavior for English-language job interviews.

    Language learning outcome: Learners can confidently respond to common job interview questions, highlighting their qualifications with appropriate formal language and culturally suitable self-promotion strategies.

    This learning outcome integrates linguistic, sociolinguistic, and intercultural competence elements.

    • Activity: A lesson on English idioms and expressions
      Language learning objective: Lesson will introduce common English idioms related to business and work.

    Language learning outcome: Learners can recognize common business idioms in context and appropriately incorporate them into their own professional discussions.

    This outcome deals with both linguistic and intercultural competence, as idioms often carry cultural meanings beyond their literal translation.

    You can see that, although language learning objectives and language learning outcomes are related, they are different, and address different aspects of the language learning process.

    EFL learning outcomes examples

    As mentioned above, well-written language learning outcomes focus on what the learner can concretely demonstrate after they complete the learning activity. A language learning outcome is only useful if it is measurable. So, it should include the observable language behaviors of the learner, the appropriate assessment method, and the specific criteria that demonstrates successful language use.

    The following examples are well-written EFL learning outcomes:

    • Learners will be able to form questions in the simple past tense to obtain information about others’ weekend activities.
    • Learners will be able to use appropriate reading strategies to identify main ideas and supporting details in authentic news articles.
    • Learners will be able to distinguish between and correctly produce the /l/ and /r/ phonemes in spontaneous speech.
    • Learners will be able to employ hedging language and indirect expressions when making requests in formal situations.
    • Learners can use a range of cohesive devices to create a coherent 250-word opinion essay on a familiar topic.
    • Learners will be able to participate in a 5-minute group discussion, taking turns appropriately and using conversational gambits to involve others.

    The following examples are poorly written EFL learning outcomes:

    • Learners will understand the simple past tense.
    • Learners will know how to read English articles.
    • Learners will appreciate English pronunciation.
    • Learners will know about polite expressions.
    • Learners will understand essay writing.
    • Learners will learn about speaking skills.

    How to write language learning outcomes

    Defining language learning outcomes is a key stage of EFL curriculum design and lesson planning, whether you follow communicative, task-based, or other methodological approaches.

    When writing language learning outcomes for EFL contexts, there are a few rules that you should follow.

    • Language learning outcomes always use an action verb that describes observable language behavior.
    • Language learning outcomes must be written clearly, and should be easy to understand for both teachers and learners.
    • Language learning outcomes should clearly indicate what language skills or knowledge learners should develop.
    • Language learning outcomes must show what the expected level of language proficiency should be, and it should be reasonable to the current level of the learners.
    • Language learning outcomes help with assessment, and thus should clearly indicate what successful language performance looks like.
    • There should not be too few or too many learning outcomes. Four to six is the ideal number for a typical language lesson.

    Language learning outcomes verbs

    What action verbs can be used when writing EFL learning outcomes?

    Depending on the language skill area and type of competence, different verbs are appropriate.

    Linguistic CompetenceSociolinguistic CompetenceDiscourse CompetenceStrategic CompetenceIntercultural Competence
    ConjugateDistinguishComposeParaphraseCompare
    PronounceAdaptOrganizeCircumlocuteRecognize
    IdentifySelectConnectReformulateInterpret
    FormExpressSequenceClarifyAdapt
    ArticulateModifyStructureNegotiateExplain
    DifferentiateChooseDevelopCompensateDemonstrate
    ClassifyApplyCreateSubstituteAnalyze
    TransformDemonstrateOutlineApproximateContrast
    ConstructRespondSummarizeGeneralizeEvaluate
    DefineGenerateLinkRepairJustify
    ReproduceRespondDraftRephraseMediate
    CombineInitiateReviseOvercomeNavigate
    TranscribeMaintainProduceSolveAppreciate
    TranslateAdjustEditImproviseRespect
    ManipulateInterpretPresentAnticipateBridge

    How to set effective learning outcomes for different EFL contexts: From beginners to advanced learners

    Setting clear language learning outcomes is essential for successful EFL instruction, whether you’re teaching complete beginners, intermediate learners, or advanced students aiming for near-native proficiency.

    A well-crafted language learning outcome ensures learners understand not only what linguistic elements they’re supposed to learn but also how to apply that knowledge in real-world communication.

    Here’s a step-by-step guide to setting impactful language learning outcomes that are appropriate for different proficiency levels.

    Identify the purpose of the language learning activity

    Before defining a language learning outcome, ask yourself: What is the communicative purpose of this lesson or activity? The purpose should align with authentic language use that learners will encounter outside the classroom.

    • Beginner level: Helping learners introduce themselves and exchange basic personal information.
    • Intermediate level: Enabling learners to discuss advantages and disadvantages of controversial topics.
    • Advanced level: Developing learners’ ability to persuade others through nuanced argumentation.

    Define what successful language use looks like

    When crafting a language learning outcome, imagine what successful language users will be able to do by the end of the lesson. Think in terms of observable communicative actions. For example, will learners be able to request information, explain a process, or justify an opinion?

    • Beginner level: Learners can ask and answer simple questions about personal information using the present simple tense.
    • Intermediate level: Learners can discuss the pros and cons of social media using appropriate linking words to connect their ideas.
    • Advanced level: Learners can construct and deliver a persuasive 5-minute speech on a complex social issue, effectively using rhetorical devices.

    Use action-oriented verbs that reflect language skills

    To make your language learning outcomes specific and measurable, use clear, action-oriented verbs that describe what the learner will be able to do with the language. Verbs like “describe,” “narrate,” “request,” and “justify” help set clear expectations for language production.

    • Beginner level: “Learners will be able to describe their daily routines using simple present tense verbs with correct third-person singular forms.”
    • Intermediate level: “Learners will be able to narrate past experiences using appropriate past tenses and time expressions.”
    • Advanced level: “Learners will be able to synthesize information from multiple listening sources and present a balanced analysis of different viewpoints.”

    Consider different language skills and competencies

    EFL learning involves multiple skills and competencies. Ensure your outcomes address the appropriate balance of skills (listening, speaking, reading, writing) and competencies (linguistic, sociolinguistic, discourse, strategic, intercultural) for your lesson focus.

    • Listening focus: “Learners can identify specific details in a radio weather forecast and take appropriate notes.”
    • Reading focus: “Learners can scan authentic menus and identify dishes that match specific dietary requirements.”
    • Writing focus: “Learners can compose a formal complaint email using appropriate tone and organizational structure.”
    • Speaking focus: “Learners can negotiate meeting arrangements, suggesting alternatives and reaching compromise.”
    • Integrated skills: “Learners can research a topic online, prepare notes, and deliver a short presentation with appropriate visual aids.”

    Keep the language learner at the center

    A strong language learning outcome is always learner-focused. This means emphasizing what the learner will accomplish communicatively, rather than what language points the instructor will cover.

    • Instead of saying: “This lesson will cover the present perfect tense,” frame the outcome as: “Learners will be able to discuss their life experiences using the present perfect tense with appropriate time markers.”
    • Instead of: “This lesson will teach vocabulary for describing people,” use: “Learners will be able to provide detailed physical and personality descriptions of family members and friends.”

    Ensure outcomes are measurable in terms of language performance

    An effective language learning outcome should be measurable to assess whether it has been achieved. Think about how you can observe or test the language outcome through performance tasks that reflect authentic communication.

    • Beginner level: “Learners can order food and drinks in a restaurant role-play using at least five food vocabulary items and appropriate politeness expressions.”
    • Intermediate level: “Learners can write a 150-word review of a movie they have seen, using appropriate past tenses and at least three descriptive adjectives.”
    • Advanced level: “Learners can participate in a 15-minute debate, presenting arguments, countering opposing views, and using at least three complex grammatical structures.”

    Align outcomes with real-world language use

    Consider how learners will use the language in authentic contexts outside the classroom. This makes language learning outcomes more relevant and engaging for learners, whether they’re learning English for academic, professional, or personal purposes.

    • General English: “Learners can make and respond to suggestions about weekend activities using appropriate modal verbs and expressions of preference.”
    • Business English: “Learners can participate effectively in a simulated job interview, highlighting their qualifications and responding appropriately to unexpected questions.”
    • Academic English: “Learners can summarize the main findings of a research article and critically evaluate its methodology using appropriate academic vocabulary.”

    Aligning outcomes with CEFR levels

    The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) provides a comprehensive framework for describing language proficiency across different skills. Aligning your learning outcomes with CEFR descriptors ensures they are internationally recognizable and appropriately sequenced.

    A1 (Beginner) level outcomes

    • “Learners can introduce themselves and others using simple expressions.”
    • “Learners can ask and answer questions about personal details such as where they live, people they know, and things they have.”
    • “Learners can interact in a simple way provided the other person talks slowly and clearly.”

    A2 (Elementary) level outcomes

    • “Learners can describe in simple terms aspects of their background, immediate environment, and matters of immediate need.”
    • “Learners can communicate in simple and routine tasks requiring a direct exchange of information.”
    • “Learners can write short, simple notes and messages relating to immediate needs.”

    B1 (Intermediate) level outcomes

    • “Learners can understand the main points of clear standard input on familiar matters regularly encountered in work, school, and leisure.”
    • “Learners can deal with most situations likely to arise while traveling in an area where the language is spoken.”
    • “Learners can produce simple connected text on topics that are familiar or of personal interest.”

    B2 (Upper Intermediate) level outcomes

    • “Learners can interact with a degree of fluency and spontaneity that makes regular interaction with native speakers quite possible without strain.”
    • “Learners can write clear, detailed text on a wide range of subjects and explain a viewpoint on a topical issue.”
    • “Learners can understand the main ideas of complex text on both concrete and abstract topics.”

    C1 (Advanced) level outcomes

    • “Learners can express themselves fluently and spontaneously without much obvious searching for expressions.”
    • “Learners can use language flexibly and effectively for social, academic, and professional purposes.”
    • “Learners can produce clear, well-structured, detailed text on complex subjects, showing controlled use of organizational patterns and cohesive devices.”

    C2 (Proficiency) level outcomes

    • “Learners can summarize information from different spoken and written sources, reconstructing arguments in a coherent presentation.”
    • “Learners can express themselves spontaneously, very fluently and precisely, differentiating finer shades of meaning even in more complex situations.”
    • “Learners can mediate effectively between speakers of the target language and of their community of origin.”

    Integrating the four language skills into learning outcomes

    Comprehensive language learning involves developing all four skills: listening, speaking, reading, and writing. Your outcomes should reflect how these skills will be developed, either individually or in integrated activities.

    Listening skill outcomes

    • “Learners will be able to identify the main points in a 3-minute news broadcast about a familiar topic.”
    • “Learners will be able to follow detailed directions to locate a place on a map.”
    • “Learners will be able to recognize different speakers’ attitudes through their intonation patterns.”

    Speaking skill outcomes

    • “Learners will be able to participate in a 5-minute conversation about hobbies, asking appropriate follow-up questions.”
    • “Learners will be able to give a structured 3-minute presentation about their home country using visual aids.”
    • “Learners will be able to negotiate a solution to a simulated workplace problem using appropriate persuasive language.”

    Reading skill outcomes

    • “Learners will be able to scan a website to locate specific information about product features and prices.”
    • “Learners will be able to identify the writer’s purpose and intended audience in short newspaper articles.”
    • “Learners will be able to infer meaning of unfamiliar vocabulary from context in authentic texts.”

    Writing skill outcomes

    • “Learners will be able to compose a 150-word email requesting information about a language course.”
    • “Learners will be able to summarize the plot of a film or book in 200 words using appropriate sequencing devices.”
    • “Learners will be able to write a 300-word argumentative essay supporting their opinion with two clearly explained reasons.”

    Integrated skills outcomes

    • “Learners will be able to listen to a lecture, take effective notes, and write a summary paragraph of the main points.”
    • “Learners will be able to read a controversial article, identify key arguments, and participate in a small group discussion expressing and justifying their own views.”
    • “Learners will be able to research a topic online, compile key information, and deliver a well-structured oral presentation with appropriate visual support.”

    In summary

    Creating effective language learning outcomes is the foundation for successful EFL teaching. By focusing on observable language performance, aligning with appropriate proficiency levels, and integrating authentic communicative purposes, you provide clear direction for both yourself and your learners.

    Well-crafted learning outcomes help your students understand what they’re working toward, allow you to design appropriate learning activities and assessments, and ensure your teaching remains focused on developing practical language skills that learners can apply in real-world contexts.

    Remember that effective language learning outcomes should be:

    • Clear and understandable
    • Focused on observable language performance
    • Appropriate to learners’ current proficiency level
    • Measurable through realistic tasks
    • Relevant to learners’ authentic language needs
    • Aligned with recognized frameworks like the CEFR

    With these principles in mind, you can create language learning outcomes that will guide your teaching and help your EFL learners achieve meaningful progress in their English language development.

  • Healthier Béchamel Sauce Recipe: Creamy, Plant-Based & Just as Delicious

    Healthier Béchamel Sauce Recipe: Creamy, Plant-Based & Just as Delicious

    Have you ever found yourself craving the velvety richness of a classic béchamel sauce but hesitated because of its less-than-stellar nutritional profile? You’re not alone! Traditional béchamel, while undeniably delicious, is typically loaded with butter, refined white flour, and whole milk—a trifecta that can leave your arteries less than thrilled.

    But what if I told you there’s a way to create that same luxurious sauce with healthier ingredients while preserving the comfort-food experience we all love?

    The Plant-Based Béchamel Revolution

    After experimenting in my kitchen for weeks, I’ve developed a béchamel recipe that swaps the usual suspects for more nutritious alternatives:

    • Extra-virgin olive oil replaces butter
    • Whole wheat flour steps in for refined white flour
    • Plant-based milk takes over for dairy milk

    The result? A sauce that’s lower in saturated fat, higher in fiber, and equally capable of transforming your favorite dishes into creamy masterpieces.

    The Recipe

    Here’s my healthier béchamel that doesn’t sacrifice an ounce of flavor:

    Ingredients:

    • 2 tablespoons extra-virgin olive oil
    • 2 tablespoons whole wheat flour
    • 2 cups warm unsweetened oat milk (or almond milk)
    • 1 small onion, finely diced
    • 2 cloves garlic, minced
    • 1 bay leaf
    • ¼ teaspoon freshly grated nutmeg
    • Salt and white pepper to taste
    • 2 tablespoons nutritional yeast (optional but recommended)

    Instructions:

    1. In a saucepan, heat olive oil over medium heat
    2. Add onion and garlic, sauté until translucent (about 3 minutes)
    3. Whisk in whole wheat flour to create a roux, cooking for 2 minutes
    4. Gradually whisk in warm plant milk, stirring constantly
    5. Add bay leaf and bring to a gentle simmer
    6. Reduce heat to low and cook for 10 minutes, stirring occasionally
    7. Remove bay leaf, season with nutmeg, salt and pepper
    8. Stir in nutritional yeast if using
    9. Blend with an immersion blender for extra smoothness (optional)

    Plant Milk: The Secret to Success

    One question I frequently receive is whether plant-based milks actually work in béchamel sauce. The answer is a resounding yes—with a few considerations.

    Choosing Your Plant Milk Wisely

    Not all plant milks are created equal when it comes to béchamel:

    • Oat milk wins the creaminess contest and has the most neutral flavor
    • Almond milk works well but adds a subtle nuttiness
    • Soy milk has great protein content and thickens nicely
    • Cashew milk offers luxurious richness but costs more

    Potential Challenges and Solutions

    Plant milks behave slightly differently than dairy in sauces, but these simple adjustments ensure success:

    1. For thinner sauces: Cook a bit longer or use the “barista” version of your plant milk
    2. For maximum creaminess: Add a tablespoon of cashew butter
    3. For flavor depth: Don’t skip the nutritional yeast—it adds umami magic
    4. For temperature control: Keep your heat gentle, as plant milks can be more heat-sensitive

    Why Make the Switch?

    Beyond the health benefits, this version of béchamel offers:

    • Environmental advantages: Plant milks generally have a lower carbon footprint
    • Digestive comfort: Perfect for those with dairy sensitivities
    • Culinary versatility: Works beautifully in everything from lasagna to croque monsieur

    Final Thoughts

    Don’t let tradition hold your culinary adventures hostage! This healthier béchamel proves that nourishing ingredients and comfort food can happily coexist. The next time you’re making a gratin or creamy pasta, give this version a try—your taste buds and your body will both thank you.

  • How I create a chatbot system prompt

    How I create a chatbot system prompt

    I’m making a system prompt that’ll act as a conversation partner for a university student in Europe who’s learning Japanese.

    Start

    Craft a system prompt that fulfills all of the criteria below to create a Level-Adapted Chatbot in Japanese. Before you generate the prompt, ask any follow-up questions that will help you create the best system prompt possible:
    
    - The LLM will serve as conversation partner for higher education students in Europe who are learning Japanese as a foreign language. The major pain points for these students are:
      - both the grammar and vocabulary are largely new and unrelated to what is found in European languages.
      - Explaining and reviewing basic structures and vocabulary is not enough to start using the language actively, both orally and in writing. 
      - Acclimatization to these languages takes a long time, and expressing relatively simple content can be cognitively demanding and exhausting.
      
    The chatbot will serve these functions:
    - Provide an opportunity for students to try out their skills and allow themselves to attempt to communicate and fail without feeling embarrassed exposed.
    - As the instructor, encourage students to train regularly with the AI-based conversation partner by using growth mindset-based encouraging language that adheres to the research conducted by Carol Dweck.
    - Assess the student's level based on the levels of the JLPT (日本語能力試験). Constantly adapt to the level of the student. 
    - Meet the needs of the student to practice conversing on different topics.
    - Correct the student's errors with explanations that use the Feynman Technique.
    - Apply relevant and appropriate university pedagogy practices.

    Follow-up questions from the AI (Claude 3.5 Sonnet)

    I’ll help craft this system prompt, but first I have some clarifying questions to ensure we create the most effective prompt possible:

    1. Should the chatbot communicate primarily in Japanese, or use a mix of Japanese and the student’s native language (especially for explanations and corrections)?
    2. Would you like the chatbot to explicitly state the JLPT level it detects, or simply adapt its responses without mentioning the level?
    3. Should the chatbot ask students about their interests/topics they want to discuss, or should it proactively suggest topics based on their detected level?
    4. Regarding error correction:
    • Should corrections be immediate or wait until the end of the student’s complete response?
    • Should the chatbot correct all errors or focus on major ones that impede communication?
    1. For the growth mindset approach:
    • Should encouragement be given after each exchange or at specific milestones?
    • Would you like specific praise for effort and strategy use rather than just correct answers?
    1. Regarding pedagogy:
    • Should the chatbot incorporate specific learning strategies (e.g., spaced repetition, scaffolding)?
    • Would you like it to occasionally suggest study tips or focus purely on conversation?
    1. Should the chatbot maintain any specific persona (e.g., friendly peer, formal teacher, etc.)?

    Once you provide these details, I can craft a comprehensive system prompt that precisely meets your needs and effectively addresses the students’ pain points.

    Second itiration of the original prompt

    Don’t answer the questions. Instead, go back and revise the original prompt you gave. This saves tokens, keeps the context window short, thereby saving money and preventing the AI from getting confused by having to process too much input.

    Craft a system prompt, formatted in Obsidian-compatible markdown, that fulfills all of the criteria below to create a Level-Adapted Chatbot in Japanese. Before you generate the prompt, ask any follow-up questions that will help you create the best system prompt possible:
    
    - The LLM will serve as conversation partner for higher education students in Europe who are learning Japanese as a foreign language. The major pain points for these students are:
      - both the grammar and vocabulary are largely new and unrelated to what is found in European languages.
      - Explaining and reviewing basic structures and vocabulary is not enough to start using the language actively, both orally and in writing. 
      - Acclimatization to these languages takes a long time, and expressing relatively simple content can be cognitively demanding and exhausting.
      
    The chatbot will serve these functions:
    - Assume the persona of a friendly Japanese university student who's generally interested in getting to know more about the user. The chatbot should make up personal details about itself and its personal history, so it can role-play as if it were a real Japanese university student.
    - Communicate with the student primarily in Japanese, but when necessary or when requested, temporarily break the fourth wall and switch to a mix of Japanese and the student's native language (especially for explanations and corrections), but always switch back to role-playing and using Japanese as soon as possible.
    - Provide an opportunity for students to try out their skills and allow themselves to attempt to communicate and fail without feeling embarrassed exposed.
    - In the role of the pretend conversation partner as well as in the role of an AI instructor, encourage students to train regularly with the AI-based conversation partner by using growth mindset-based encouraging language that adheres to the research conducted by Carol Dweck. (When writing the system prompt, don't assume the AI is familiar with Dweck's research. Explain what the AI should do.) Encouragement should be given at specific milestones and after every few exchanges. (Be encouraging, but don't be annoying by giving too much praise that might sound condescending and insincere.)
    - Assess the student's language ability level based on the levels of the JLPT (日本語能力試験). Constantly adapt to the level of the student. It's not necessary for the chatbot to explicitly state the JLPT level it detects. It should simply adapt its responses without mentioning the level, but when the session with the student is wrapping up, tell the student what you estimate their JLPT level to be.
    - Meet the needs of the student to practice conversing on different topics. The chatbot should ask if the student has interests/topics they want to discuss, and if not, it should suggest topics based on their detected level and topics that are commonly discussed when Japanese engage in conversation with foreigners.
    - Correct the student's errors with explanations that use the Feynman Technique. Corrections should wait until the end of the student's complete response so as not to interrupt the flow of the conversation.
    - Apply relevant and appropriate university pedagogy practices. Focus correction primarily on major mistakes that impede communication. Use Stephen Krashen's reasearch about "monitoring" and error correction as a basis of when to correct and when not to correct. the chatbot should incorporate teaching strategies such as spaced repetition and scaffolding.
    - When a student seems interested in wrapping up a conversation, provide a summary of the session that the student can share with their instructor so that the instructor can keep track of the student's effort and progress.

    More Follow-up Questions!

    The questions tend to get better for a while, then they start to get worse. When you’ve iterated so many times that the AI is asking only uninteresting questions and questions that are too “in the weeds”, stop telling it to ask follow-up questions.

    I’ll help craft this system prompt, but first I have a few clarifying questions to ensure we create the most effective prompt possible:

    1. Regarding the student’s native language:
    • Should the prompt specify one particular European language for explanations, or should it be flexible/specified by the user at the start of each conversation?
    • Should there be a default language (like English) if none is specified?
    1. For error correction:
    • Would you like to specify a particular ratio or threshold for when to correct errors? (e.g., only correct errors that appear multiple times or errors that significantly impact comprehension)
    • Should the chatbot ask the student at the beginning if they prefer immediate or end-of-conversation corrections?
    1. Regarding the session summary:
    • What specific elements should be included in the end-of-session summary? (e.g., topics covered, major error patterns, vocabulary introduced, estimated JLPT level)
    • Should the summary be provided in Japanese, the student’s native language, or both?
    1. For the chatbot’s persona:
    • Should we specify certain personality traits or interests that would be most conducive to language learning?
    • Should we define specific background details (like university major, hometown, etc.) in the prompt, or let the AI generate these dynamically?
    1. Regarding scaffolding:
    • Should we specify particular scaffolding techniques or let the AI choose based on the context?
    • Should we include specific guidelines for when to introduce new vocabulary or grammar patterns?

    Once you provide these details, I can create a comprehensive system prompt that precisely meets your requirements while maintaining flexibility where needed.

    More Follow-up questions

    These round of questions isn’t 100% useful, but it gave me new some ideas I hadn’t originally thought of!

    Before crafting the system prompt, I have a few clarifying questions to ensure I create the most effective prompt possible:

    1. Should the chatbot explicitly assess the student’s JLPT level at the beginning of the conversation, or should it do so silently and adapt naturally?
    2. Regarding error correction: Would you like the chatbot to ask the student their preferences for correction frequency and style at the beginning of each session, or should it use a default approach?
    3. For the personal details of the chatbot’s persona: Should these be completely randomized each time, or should there be some constraints to ensure the persona remains realistic and relatable to university students?
    4. Regarding the growth mindset encouragement: Should this be expressed both in the role-play persona and in “instructor mode,” or primarily in one mode?
    5. For the session summary: Would you like specific metrics included (such as number of exchanges, percentage of successful communications, etc.), or should it be more qualitative?
    6. Should the chatbot explicitly introduce the vocabulary and grammar patterns it’s using as “i+1” content, or should this be seamlessly integrated without drawing attention to it?
    7. When switching between Japanese and the student’s native language for explanations, should there be clear markers or transitions, or should it flow naturally?

    Once you provide these clarifications, I can craft a comprehensive system prompt that precisely meets your needs.

    More questions as I iterate…

    I’ll help craft this system prompt, but first I have a few clarifying questions to ensure the prompt is as effective as possible:

    1. Should there be specific parameters for how frequently the chatbot switches to “instructor mode” for corrections and explanations? For example, should it wait until a certain number of errors accumulate, or should it interrupt after particularly serious errors?
    2. Regarding the persona generation: Should there be any constraints on the demographic details to make the character more relatable to the average university student? (For example, age range, typical majors, etc.)
    3. For the session summary: Would you like to specify a particular format or structure? This could help maintain consistency across sessions and make it easier for instructors to track progress.
    4. Regarding the implementation of spaced repetition: Should the chatbot actively track previously discussed topics and vocabulary to deliberately reintroduce them in future conversations? If so, how should this be balanced with new topics?
    5. When applying Krashen’s i+1 theory, should there be specific guidelines for how much new vocabulary/grammar to introduce per conversation? This could help prevent overwhelming the student while ensuring steady progress.
    6. For the error correction using the Feynman Technique, should there be a specific format or structure for how these explanations should be presented?
    7. Regarding the “growth mindset” encouragement: Would you like to specify particular triggers or intervals for when encouragement should be given?

    Once you provide these details, I can craft a comprehensive system prompt that precisely addresses all requirements while maintaining natural conversation flow.

    To be continued…

    I have to move on to other things, but here’s the prompt in its current form. When I’m happy with it, I’ll remove the part where I tell it to ask me follow-up questions and It’ll generate a system prompt I can paste into Gemini and try out. Then, I’ll move on to troubleshooting the prompt.

    I like to keep my prompts in Obsidian because it uses markdown formatting and LLMs understand markdown. It actually helps them do a better job.

    Craft a system prompt, formatted in Obsidian-compatible markdown, that fulfills all of the criteria below to create a Level-Adapted Chatbot in Japanese. Before you generate the prompt, ask any follow-up questions that will help you create the best system prompt possible:
    
    - The LLM will serve as conversation partner for higher education students in Europe who are learning Japanese as a foreign language. The major pain points for these students are:
      - both the grammar and vocabulary are largely new and unrelated to what is found in European languages.
      - Explaining and reviewing basic structures and vocabulary is not enough to start using the language actively, both orally and in writing. 
      - Acclimatization to these languages takes a long time, and expressing relatively simple content can be cognitively demanding and exhausting.
      
    The chatbot will serve these functions:
    - Assume the persona of a friendly Japanese university student who's generally interested in getting to know more about the user. The chatbot should dynamically generate personal details about itself and its personal history (gender, sexual identity, sexual orientation, university major, hometown, family members, etc.), so it can role-play as if it were a real Japanese university student. Ensure the persona remains realistic and relatable to university students. The AI should keep track of the personal information it has made for itself so it doesn't change mid-conversation and cause confusion.
    - Communicate with the student primarily in Japanese, but when necessary or when requested, temporarily break the fourth wall and switch to a mix of Japanese and the student's native language (especially for explanations and corrections), but always switch back to role-playing and using Japanese as soon as possible. Assume the student's native language is the language the student uses when not communicating in Japanese. When switching between Japanese and the student's native language for explanations, should there be clear markers or transitions, then it should flow naturally back into character. The role-played character should pretend it doesn't know the "instructor" interrupted the conversation.
    - Provide an opportunity for students to try out their skills and allow themselves to attempt to communicate and fail without feeling embarrassed exposed.
    - In the role of the pretend conversation partner as well as in the role of an AI instructor, encourage students to train regularly with the AI-based conversation partner by using growth mindset-based encouraging language that adheres to the research conducted by Carol Dweck. (When writing the system prompt, don't assume the AI is familiar with Dweck's research. Explain what the AI should do.) Encouragement should be given at specific milestones and after every few exchanges. (Be encouraging, but don't be annoying by giving too much praise that might sound condescending and insincere.). This should be expressed both in the role-play persona and in "instructor mode", but particularly in the instructor mode. We want the user to be self-motivated to continue using the chatbot on a regular basis.
    - Assess the student's language ability level based on the levels of the JLPT (日本語能力試験). Constantly adapt to the level of the student. Introduce new vocabulary and grammar patterns based on Stephen Krashen's "i+1" comprehensible input theory. (Don't assume the AI knows what that is, tell the AI what to do in the system prompt.) It's not necessary for the chatbot to explicitly state the JLPT level it detects. It should simply adapt its responses without mentioning the level, but when the session with the student is wrapping up, tell the student what you estimate their JLPT level to be.
    - Meet the needs of the student to practice conversing on different topics. The chatbot should ask if the student has interests/topics they want to discuss, and if not, it should suggest topics based on their detected level and topics that are commonly discussed when Japanese engage in conversation with foreigners.
    - Correct the student's errors with explanations that use the Feynman Technique. Corrections should wait until the end of the student's complete response so as not to interrupt the flow of the conversation.
    - Apply relevant and appropriate university pedagogy practices. Focus correction primarily on major mistakes that impede communication. Use Stephen Krashen's research about "monitoring" and error correction as a basis of when to correct and when not to correct. The chatbot should incorporate teaching strategies such as spaced repetition and scaffolding, based on context. The chatbot should include in the ending summary the vocabulary and grammar patterns it's used as "i+1" content. Additionally, that content should be seamlessly integrated without drawing attention to it when role-playing. In the summary, they chatbot should actively track discussed topics and vocabulary to deliberately reintroduce them in future conversations for spaced repetition practice. This needs to be balanced with new topics. (i.e. don't keep bringing something up over and over unless the student seems to be having trouble recalling what they should have already learned.)
    
    - When a student seems interested in wrapping up a conversation, provide a summary of the session that the student can share with their instructor so that the instructor can keep track of the student's effort and progress. The summary should include topics covered, major error patterns, vocabulary introduced, estimated JLPT level. The summary should be provided in both the student's native language and in Japanese, because we don't know the nationality of the student's teacher. Also, summarize the chatbot's made-up persona so the users can choose to talk to the same person next time. Which means that at the beginning of a chat session, the users should be able to enter that information and continue a previous conversation where they left off.

    My own follow-up questions to its questions

    I’ll end with this, and later I’ll incorporate Claude’s answers into the above system prompt.

    I’ll quickly mention another neat trick I often use: After Claude has given me as much as I think it can give, I turn over Claude’s work to the Gemini thinking model and basically ask it, “What do you think of this? What are its strengths and weaknesses? How can you make it better? Then I feed that back into Claude, asking it nearly the same question, “Another LLM said this about your work, what do you think? What do agree and disagree with?” And I go back and forth between the two until all three of us agree. It’s quite interesting!

    About your question, "Should there be specific parameters for how frequently the chatbot switches to "instructor mode" for corrections and explanations? For example, should it wait until a certain number of errors accumulate, or should it interrupt after particularly serious errors?" What do you think Stephen Krashen would recommend, based on an assement of his published works?
    
    About your question: "For the session summary: Would you like to specify a particular format or structure? This could help maintain consistency across sessions and make it easier for instructors to track progress." What format would make it easiest for the AI to ingest and use in subsequent chat sessions, so it will seem to the studend that they're picking up their conversaion where they left off? For example, maybe we can pretend that they are meeting for coffee on a regular basis.

    Excellent points – let me address these based on Krashen’s research and practical implementation:

    Regarding error correction timing, Krashen’s research suggests:

    • Excessive correction can raise the “affective filter” and increase anxiety
    • Focus should be on errors that impede communication
    • Correction should primarily occur when the student is consciously “monitoring” their output
    • Natural conversation flow should be prioritized over immediate correction
    • Corrections are most effective when the student is ready to acquire that particular feature

    So the system prompt should instruct the AI to:

    • Primarily note errors without immediate correction during natural conversation
    • Only interrupt for serious errors that cause communication breakdown
    • Save most corrections for the end of a complete thought or exchange
    • Focus correction on patterns rather than every minor mistake
    • Be particularly attentive when the student explicitly asks for feedback

    For the session summary and continuity format, I suggest structuring it like this:

    【Session Details】
    Date: [Date]
    Duration: [Time]
    Location: [e.g., Campus Coffee Shop]
    
    【Persona Details】
    Name: [Name]
    Age: [Age]
    University/Major: [Details]
    Personality traits: [Key characteristics]
    Other established background: [Family, hometown, interests, etc.]
    
    【Conversation Summary】
    Topics covered: [List]
    Student's approximate JLPT level: [N1-N5]
    Key vocabulary introduced: [List with contexts]
    Grammar patterns practiced: [List with examples]
    Error patterns observed: [Major patterns]
    
    【Spaced Repetition Tracking】
    Topics for review: [Previous topics needing reinforcement]
    Vocabulary for review: [Words/phrases needing practice]
    Grammar points for review: [Structures needing practice]
    
    【Next Session Planning】
    Suggested topics: [Based on progress and interests]
    Target areas: [Skills/topics to focus on]

    Would you like me to proceed with crafting the full system prompt incorporating these elements? Also, should I address any of my other questions first, or do you have guidance on those aspects?

    —fin—, for now.

  • Simple System Prompt for Easy English conversation

    Paste the below into the “System Instructions” section of aistudio.google.com. It works at least with Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental 01-21. I didn’t try any of the other models.

    It’s a list of the first 1600 words in the NGSL list. This is the closest I can find to the words that JHS students are supposed to have a working knowledge of, according to MEXT’s revised curriculum guidelines from 2017.

    You can only use the words below when chatting with the user.
    
    the
    be
    and
    of
    to
    a
    in
    have
    it
    you
    he
    for
    they
    not
    that
    we
    on
    with
    this
    I
    do
    as
    at
    she
    but
    from
    by
    will
    or
    say
    go
    so
    all
    if
    one
    would
    about
    can
    which
    there
    know
    more
    get
    who
    like
    when
    think
    make
    time
    see
    what
    up
    some
    other
    out
    good
    people
    year
    take
    no
    well
    because
    very
    just
    come
    could
    work
    use
    than
    now
    then
    also
    into
    only
    look
    want
    give
    first
    new
    way
    find
    over
    any
    after
    day
    where
    thing
    most
    should
    need
    much
    right
    how
    back
    mean
    even
    may
    here
    many
    such
    last
    child
    tell
    really
    call
    before
    company
    through
    down
    show
    life
    man
    change
    place
    long
    between
    feel
    too
    still
    problem
    write
    same
    lot
    great
    try
    leave
    number
    both
    own
    part
    point
    little
    help
    ask
    meet
    start
    talk
    something
    put
    another
    become
    interest
    country
    old
    each
    school
    late
    high
    different
    off
    next
    end
    live
    why
    while
    world
    week
    play
    might
    must
    home
    never
    include
    course
    house
    report
    group
    case
    woman
    around
    book
    family
    seem
    let
    again
    kind
    keep
    hear
    system
    every
    question
    during
    always
    big
    set
    small
    study
    follow
    begin
    important
    since
    run
    under
    turn
    few
    bring
    early
    hand
    state
    move
    money
    fact
    however
    area
    provide
    name
    read
    friend
    month
    large
    business
    without
    information
    open
    order
    government
    word
    issue
    market
    pay
    build
    hold
    service
    against
    believe
    second
    though
    yes
    love
    increase
    job
    plan
    result
    away
    example
    happen
    offer
    young
    close
    program
    lead
    buy
    understand
    thank
    far
    today
    hour
    student
    face
    hope
    idea
    cost
    less
    room
    until
    reason
    form
    spend
    head
    car
    learn
    level
    person
    experience
    once
    member
    enough
    bad
    city
    night
    able
    support
    whether
    line
    present
    side
    quite
    although
    sure
    term
    least
    age
    low
    speak
    within
    process
    public
    often
    train
    possible
    actually
    rather
    view
    together
    consider
    price
    parent
    hard
    party
    local
    control
    already
    concern
    product
    lose
    story
    almost
    continue
    stand
    whole
    yet
    rate
    care
    expect
    effect
    sort
    ever
    anything
    cause
    fall
    deal
    water
    send
    allow
    soon
    watch
    base
    probably
    suggest
    past
    power
    test
    visit
    center
    grow
    nothing
    return
    mother
    walk
    matter
    mind
    value
    office
    record
    stay
    force
    stop
    several
    light
    develop
    remember
    bit
    share
    real
    answer
    sit
    figure
    letter
    decide
    language
    subject
    class
    development
    town
    half
    minute
    food
    break
    clear
    future
    either
    ago
    per
    remain
    top
    among
    win
    color
    involve
    reach
    social
    period
    across
    note
    history
    create
    drive
    along
    type
    sound
    eye
    music
    game
    political
    free
    receive
    moment
    sale
    policy
    further
    body
    require
    wait
    general
    appear
    toward
    team
    easy
    individual
    full
    black
    sense
    perhaps
    add
    rule
    pass
    produce
    sell
    short
    agree
    law
    everything
    research
    cover
    paper
    position
    near
    human
    computer
    situation
    staff
    activity
    film
    morning
    war
    account
    shop
    major
    someone
    above
    design
    event
    special
    sometimes
    condition
    carry
    choose
    father
    decision
    table
    certain
    forward
    main
    die
    bear
    cut
    describe
    himself
    available
    especially
    strong
    rise
    girl
    maybe
    community
    else
    particular
    role
    join
    difficult
    please
    detail
    difference
    action
    health
    eat
    step
    TRUE
    phone
    themselves
    draw
    white
    date
    practice
    model
    raise
    customer
    front
    explain
    door
    outside
    behind
    economic
    site
    approach
    teacher
    land
    charge
    finally
    sign
    claim
    relationship
    travel
    enjoy
    death
    nice
    amount
    improve
    picture
    boy
    regard
    organization
    happy
    couple
    act
    range
    quality
    project
    round
    opportunity
    road
    accord
    list
    wish
    therefore
    wear
    fund
    rest
    kid
    industry
    education
    measure
    kill
    serve
    likely
    certainly
    national
    itself
    teach
    field
    security
    air
    benefit
    trade
    risk
    news
    standard
    vote
    percent
    focus
    stage
    space
    instead
    realize
    usually
    data
    single
    address
    performance
    chance
    accept
    society
    technology
    mention
    choice
    save
    common
    culture
    total
    demand
    material
    limit
    listen
    due
    wrong
    foot
    effort
    attention
    upon
    check
    complete
    lie
    pick
    reduce
    personal
    ground
    animal
    arrive
    patient
    current
    century
    evidence
    exist
    similar
    fight
    leader
    fine
    street
    former
    contact
    particularly
    wife
    sport
    prepare
    discuss
    response
    voice
    piece
    finish
    suppose
    apply
    president
    fire
    compare
    court
    police
    store
    poor
    knowledge
    laugh
    arm
    heart
    source
    employee
    manage
    simply
    bank
    firm
    cell
    article
    fast
    attack
    foreign
    surprise
    feature
    factor
    pretty
    recently
    affect
    drop
    recent
    relate
    official
    financial
    miss
    art
    campaign
    private
    pause
    everyone
    forget
    page
    worry
    summer
    drink
    opinion
    park
    represent
    key
    inside
    manager
    international
    contain
    notice
    wonder
    nature
    structure
    section
    myself
    exactly
    plant
    paint
    worker
    press
    whatever
    necessary
    region
    growth
    evening
    influence
    respect
    various
    catch
    thus
    skill
    attempt
    son
    simple
    medium
    average
    stock
    management
    character
    bed
    hit
    establish
    indeed
    final
    economy
    fit
    guy
    function
    yesterday
    image
    size
    behavior
    addition
    determine
    station
    population
    fail
    environment
    production
    contract
    player
    comment
    enter
    occur
    alone
    significant
    drug
    wall
    series
    direct
    success
    tomorrow
    director
    clearly
    lack
    review
    depend
    race
    recognize
    window
    purpose
    department
    gain
    tree
    college
    argue
    board
    holiday
    mark
    church
    machine
    achieve
    item
    prove
    cent
    season
    floor
    stuff
    wide
    anyone
    method
    analysis
    election
    military
    hotel
    club
    below
    movie
    doctor
    discussion
    sorry
    challenge
    nation
    nearly
    statement
    link
    despite
    introduce
    advantage
    ready
    marry
    strike
    mile
    seek
    ability
    unit
    card
    hospital
    quickly
    interview
    agreement
    release
    tax
    solution
    capital
    popular
    specific
    beautiful
    fear
    aim
    television
    serious
    target
    degree
    pull
    red
    husband
    access
    movement
    treat
    identify
    loss
    shall
    modern
    pressure
    bus
    treatment
    conference
    yourself
    supply
    village
    worth
    natural
    express
    indicate
    attend
    brother
    investment
    score
    organize
    trip
    beyond
    sleep
    fish
    promise
    potential
    energy
    trouble
    relation
    touch
    file
    middle
    bar
    suffer
    strategy
    deep
    except
    clean
    tend
    advance
    fill
    star
    network
    generally
    operation
    match
    avoid
    seat
    throw
    task
    normal
    goal
    associate
    blue
    positive
    option
    box
    huge
    message
    instance
    style
    refer
    cold
    push
    quarter
    assume
    baby
    successful
    sing
    doubt
    competition
    theory
    propose
    reference
    argument
    adult
    fly
    document
    pattern
    application
    hot
    obviously
    unclear
    bill
    search
    separate
    central
    career
    anyway
    speech
    dog
    officer
    throughout
    oil
    dress
    profit
    guess
    fun
    protect
    resource
    science
    disease
    balance
    damage
    basis
    author
    basic
    encourage
    hair
    male
    operate
    reflect
    exercise
    useful
    restaurant
    income
    property
    previous
    dark
    imagine
    okay
    earn
    daughter
    post
    newspaper
    define
    conclusion
    clock
    everybody
    weekend
    perform
    professional
    mine
    debate
    memory
    green
    song
    object
    maintain
    credit
    ring
    discover
    dead
    afternoon
    prefer
    extend
    possibility
    direction
    facility
    variety
    daily
    clothes
    screen
    track
    dance
    completely
    female
    responsibility
    original
    sister
    rock
    dream
    nor
    university
    easily
    agency
    dollar
    garden
    fix
    ahead
    cross
    yeah
    candidate
    weight
    legal
    proposal
    version
    conversation
    somebody
    pound
    magazine
    shape
    sea
    immediately
    welcome
    smile
    communication
    agent
    traditional
    replace
    judge
    herself
    suddenly
    generation
    estimate
    favorite
    difficulty
    purchase
    shoot
    announce
    unless
    independent
    recommend
    survey
    majority
    stick
    request
    rich
    wind
    none
    exchange
    budget
    famous
    blood
    appropriate
    block
    warm
    count
    scene
    writer
    content
    prevent
    safe
    invite
    mix
    element
    effective
    correct
    medical
    admit
    beat
    telephone
    copy
    committee
    aware
    advice
    handle
    glass
    trial
    stress
    radio
    administration
    complex
    text
    context
    ride
    directly
    heavy
    remove
    conduct
    equipment
    otherwise
    title
    extra
    executive
    chair
    expensive
    sample
    sex
    deliver
    video
    connection
    primary
    weather
    collect
    inform
    principle
    straight
    appeal
    highly
    trust
    wonderful
    flat
    absolutely
    flow
    fair
    additional
    responsible
    farm
    collection
    hang
    negative
    band
    relative
    tour
    alternative
    software
    pair
    ship
    attitude
    cheap
    double
    leg
    observe
    sentence
    print
    progress
    truth
    nobody
    examine
    lay
    speed
    politics
    reply
    display
    transfer
    perfect
    slightly
    overall
    intend
    user
    respond
    dinner
    slow
    regular
    physical
    apart
    suit
    federal
    reveal
    percentage
    peace
    status
    crime
    decline
    decade
    launch
    warn
    consumer
    favor
    dry
    partner
    institution
    spot
    horse
    eventually
    heat
    excite
    reader
    importance
    distance
    guide
    grant
    taxi
    feed
    pain
    sector
    mistake
    ensure
    satisfy
    chief
    cool
    expert
    wave
    south
    labor
    surface
    library
    excellent
    edge
    camp
    audience
    lift
    procedure
    email
    global
    struggle
    advertise
    select
    surround
    extent
    river
    annual
    fully
    contrast
    roll
    reality
    photograph
    artist
    conflict
    entire
    presence
    crowd
    corner
    gas
    shift
    net
    category
    secretary
    defense
    quick
    cook
    spread
    nuclear
    scale
    driver
    ball
    cry
    introduction
    requirement
    north
    confirm
    senior
    photo
    refuse
    transport
    emerge
    map
    concept
    island
    reform
    neither
    football
    survive
    flight
    left
    solve
    neighbor
    background
    technique
    traffic
    improvement
    tool
    consequence
    circumstance
    smoke
    reaction
    rain
    busy
    lesson
    brain
    mass
    funny
    contribute
    failure
    schedule
    speaker
    bottom
    adopt
    combine
    mountain
    waste
    hide
    marriage
    ticket
    meal
    colleague
    bag
    repeat
    equal
    expression
    plus
    extremely
    owner
    plane
    commercial
    lady
    duty
    strength
    connect
    cultural
    arrange
    scheme
    payment
    unfortunately
    brief
    bird
    demonstrate
    contribution
    appreciate
    chapter
    secret
    apparently
    novel
    union
    burn
    trend
    initial
    pleasure
    suggestion
    critical
    gather
    mostly
    earth
    pop
    essential
    desire
    promote
    currently
    employ
    path
    topic
    beach
    attract
    engage
    powerful
    flower
    crisis
    settle
    boat
    aid
    fan
    kitchen
    twice
    fresh
    delay
    safety
    engineer
    quiet
    insurance
    nurse
    divide
    length
    investigation
    package
    somewhere
    expand
    commit
    obvious
    jump
    weapon
    relatively
    host
    winter
    district
    broad
    tire
    spring
    spirit
    lunch
    actual
    pool
    battle
    tradition
    cash
    hardly
    award
    coach
    experiment
    consideration
    strange
    code
    possibly
    threat
    accident
    impossible
    revenue
    enable
    afraid
    active
    conclude
    religious
    cancer
    convince
    vary
    environmental
    sun
    healthy
    blow
    volume
    location
    invest
    proceed
    wash
    actor
    glad
    tape
    whereas
    opposite
    stone
    sum
    murder
    monitor
    soldier
    finance
    hate
    egg
    concert
    shock
    comfortable
    usual
    carefully
    pack
    recall
    wine
    camera
    swim
    manufacture
    theater
    cycle
    coffee
    totally
    museum
    visitor
    freedom
    construction
    dear
    objective
    moreover
    onto
    historical
    oppose
    branch
    vehicle
    scientist
    route
    bind
    belong
    taste
    tonight
    fashion
    danger
    bomb
    army
    dangerous
    decrease
    hurt
    council
    editor
    normally
    sight
    generate
    gift
    delivery
    deny
    guest
    anybody
    bedroom
    quote
    climb
    basically
    violence
    minister
    mainly
    mouth
    noise
    manner
    gun
    square
    occasion
    familiar
    ignore
    destroy
    affair
    civil
    locate
    citizen
    temperature
    gold
    domestic
    load
    belief
    troop
    technical
    remind
    arrangement
    skin
    prison
    switch
    acquire
    corporate
    fairly
    wood
    participate
    tough
    tear
    representative
    capacity
    border
    shake
    assessment
    shoe
    ought
    ad
    fee
    hall
    regulation
    escape
    studio
    proper
    relax
    tourist
    component
    afford
    lawyer
    suspect
    cup
    description
    confidence
    industrial
    complain
    perspective
    error
    arrest
    assess
    register
    asset
    signal
    finger
    relevant
    explore
    leadership
    commitment
    wake
    necessarily
    bright
    frame
    slowly
    bond
    hire
    hole
    tie
    internal
    chain
    literature
    victim
    threaten
    division
    secure
    amaze
    device
    birth
    forest
    label
    root
    factory
    expense
    channel
    investigate
    recommendation
    rank
    typical
    west
    friendly
    resident
    provision
    concentrate
    plenty
    export
    entirely
    strongly
    bridge
    consist
    graduate
    brand
    moral
    insist
    combination
    abuse
    ice
    principal
    master
    definitely
    session
    grade
    nevertheless
    predict
    previously
    protection
    largely
    wed
    rent
    shot
    appearance
    reasonable
    guarantee
    till
    theme
    judgment
    odd
    approve
    loan
    definition
    elect
    atmosphere
    farmer
    comparison
    characteristic
    license
    rely
    narrow
    succeed
    identity
    desk
    permit
    seriously
    wild
    empty
    commission
    unique
    association
    instrument
    investor
    practical
    tea
    lovely