I’m creating a comprehensive automated life management system using n8n to help manage my ADHD and autism. This system will serve as a virtual executive function assistant, helping me organize tasks, manage time, prioritize effectively, and overcome executive function challenges that have significantly impacted my life.
Core Problem I’m Addressing
As an adult with ADHD and autism, I struggle with:
Task initiation and completion
Prioritization (spending too much time on unimportant but novel tasks)
Time management and awareness
Project follow-through (getting stuck in perpetual planning/learning loops)
Overwhelming feelings when faced with large task lists
Rejection sensitivity dysphoria that prevents important actions
Difficulty maintaining regular routines and habits
Despite having skills and capabilities, these executive function challenges have created significant barriers to my financial stability and professional success.
The Workflow Solution
I’m building an n8n workflow that functions as a 24/7 life coach by:
1. Centralized Task Management
Capturing tasks from multiple input methods (Telegram bot, Obsidian)
Storing and organizing them with metadata (deadlines, importance, effort)
Breaking large projects into manageable steps
Tracking task status and completion history
2. Intelligent Prioritization System
Using Ollama (local AI) to analyze and prioritize tasks based on:
Deadlines and time sensitivity
Real-world impact and importance
My energy patterns and executive function state
Implementation of evidence-based ADHD management techniques
Helping me focus on what truly matters rather than being diverted by novelty
3. Dynamic Scheduling and Time Management
Integrating with Google Calendar for visual time blocking
Creating appropriate work/break schedules based on task demands
Implementing buffer time for transitions
Sending strategic reminders to leverage the Zeigarnik effect
Delivering contextual notifications to my smartwatch at appropriate moments
4. Behavioral Pattern Analysis
Integrating with RescueTime to understand my actual productivity patterns
Tracking mood, energy, and focus levels throughout the day
Recognizing what strategies are working and what aren’t
Adapting recommendations based on empirical data about my behavior
5. Specialized Workflow Components
Invoice Assistant: Automated system to overcome my invoice avoidance
Project Completer: Breaking down stalled projects (like my school website) into actionable steps
Financial Health Monitor: Tracking income, spending, and financial goals
Emotional Regulation Support: Providing CBT/DBT-inspired interventions when needed
Technical Implementation
The system utilizes:
n8n running in Docker on my M1 Mac for workflow automation
Ollama for local AI processing (avoiding privacy concerns and costs of cloud AI)
Obsidian for knowledge management and task storage
Google Calendar for scheduling
Telegram for mobile interaction and notifications
RescueTime for activity tracking
JavaScript custom functions for personalized logic
Webhooks for event-based triggers
Why This Approach Is Essential
Traditional task management apps don’t address the specific executive function challenges of ADHD. This custom system:
Removes Decision Fatigue: Tells me exactly what to do when, reducing the paralysis of choice
Provides External Scaffolding: Creates the structure my brain struggles to maintain internally
Leverages Technology: Uses automation to compensate for executive function deficits
Adapts to My Specific Needs: Can be continuously refined based on what works for my particular ADHD presentation
Reduces Cognitive Load: Handles the mental overhead of tracking, prioritizing, and scheduling
Creates Accountability: Provides consistent feedback and monitoring
This isn’t just about productivity—it’s about creating an external executive function system that compensates for neurological differences. The goal is to build a reliable support structure that allows me to overcome the barriers that have prevented financial stability and professional success, despite having the necessary capabilities.
By combining current technological tools with evidence-based ADHD management strategies, this n8n workflow aims to provide the consistent structure and support that would otherwise require a live-in human executive function coach.
This transcript features a conversation between the host, Matt Brooks-Green, and Dr Angelika Kraemer, Director of the Language Resource Center at Cornell University, about adult language learning. Here’s a summary of the key points:
How Adults Learn Languages:
Existing Framework: Adults already have a framework from their first language(s), making the process different from children, who start with a “blank slate.”
Motivation & Communication: Adults are often motivated by a desire to communicate, not just learn rules.
Experience: Adults draw on communication experiences from various backgrounds and cultures.
Similarities & Differences: While the brain functions differently, there are more similarities than differences in how adults and children acquire languages.
Traditional vs. Modern Methods:
Traditional Ineffectiveness: Traditional methods of rote memorization and grammar drills are often ineffective for communication.
Goal-Oriented Learning: The best approach depends on individual goals (reading, speaking, etc.).
Focus on Communication: Modern approaches prioritize communication and interaction over strict rule-learning.
There is value in grammar.
Language learners should make mistakes.
Technology in Language Learning:
Increased Access: Technology provides access to a vast range of resources (movies, music, news) and potential communication partners.
Gamification: Apps can motivate some learners through gamified approaches (streaks, points).
Human Interaction is Key: Technology cannot replace human interaction and immersion in a language and culture.
AI Concerns: AI is limited by its data and may not be entirely accurate, requiring fact-checking.
Language Availability: Resources are not equally available for all languages, with less commonly taught languages having fewer options.
Vet Resources: Learners need to discern between effective and ineffective resources, seeking advice from teachers or experienced individuals.
Culture’s Role in Language Learning:
Culture as a Lens: Culture shapes how language is understood and used.
Non-Verbal Communication: Gestures, empathy, and politeness vary across cultures.
Humor and Idioms: Humor, sarcasm, and idiomatic expressions are culture-specific and challenging to master.
Cross-Cultural Competence: Learning a language fosters respect for different cultures and promotes cross-cultural understanding.
Cultural vs. Linguistic Ability: Cultural knowledge is needed.
Advice for Language Learners:
Find a Teacher/Partner: Human interaction is crucial for guidance and practice.
Don’t Be Shy: Embrace making mistakes as part of the learning process.
Be Patient and Compassionate: Language learning takes time and consistent effort.
Regular Exposure: Immerse yourself in the language through various media (music, news).
Focus on the Benefits: Remind yourself of the connections and opportunities that language proficiency can create.
In essence, Dr. Kramer emphasizes that adult language learning is a complex process influenced by individual motivations, goals, and experiences. While technology offers valuable resources, it’s crucial to prioritize human interaction, cultural understanding, and consistent practice.
Selecting a model on the right. I use “Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental 01-21” or “Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental 02-05” if the thinking model is acting wonky.
Past or upload a photo to the text area at the bottom of the page, the same place where you type your commands.
Tell it the CEFR level for the lesson (CEFR A1, A2, B1, B2, C1 or C2). For example:
Don't assume the students are small children. They can be JHS or HS students, or adults. Create a CEFR A2 lesson.
The System Prompt
(It’s a good read too. It’s useful instructions for how to create a lesson even if you don’t use AI.)
# CEFR-Based EFL Photo Description Lesson Generator
## Purpose and Scope
You are an expert EFL (English as a Foreign Language) curriculum developer specializing in creating educational blog posts from photo descriptions. Your role is to transform complex descriptions of photographs into structured, level-appropriate English lessons for Japanese learners, organized according to CEFR proficiency levels (A1-C2).
Your primary functions are to:
1. Analyze photo descriptions to extract relevant vocabulary and language points
2. Adapt content to match specific CEFR proficiency levels
3. Create complete, printable blog post lessons with appropriate activities
4. Provide supplementary teaching recommendations
This system addresses the needs of EFL instructors teaching Japanese-speaking students who want to transform visual content into comprehensive language lessons.
## Requirements and Process
### Initial Analysis
1. Parse the provided photo description thoroughly
2. Extract key vocabulary items relevant to the image description:
- Objects, people, actions, colors, emotions, spatial relationships
- Clothing, facial features, environmental elements, artistic qualities
- Technical terms related to photography when relevant
### Adaptation Process by CEFR Level
For each proficiency level, adapt content as follows:
#### CEFR A1 (Beginner)
- Simplify vocabulary to most basic terms (nouns, common adjectives, basic verbs)
- Use present simple tense predominantly
- Keep sentences short (5-8 words)
- Provide Japanese translations for ALL instructions and vocabulary items
- Focus on concrete, visible elements in the photo
- Use mostly SVO sentence structures
- Include picture-based activities and simple fill-in-the-blank exercises
#### CEFR A2 (Elementary)
- Introduce more descriptive vocabulary (basic adjectives, common adverbs)
- Incorporate present continuous and simple past tenses
- Use sentences of 8-12 words with basic conjunctions (and, but, or)
- Provide Japanese translations for all instructions and key vocabulary
- Include writing and speaking activities with scaffolding
- Add matching exercises and guided discussion questions
#### CEFR B1 (Intermediate)
- Introduce more nuanced descriptive vocabulary
- Incorporate a wider range of tenses and some modal verbs
- Use compound sentences and simple complex sentences
- Provide Japanese translations only for advanced vocabulary
- Include more creative writing activities and role-plays
- Add discussion questions requiring opinions
- Include paragraph-writing tasks
#### CEFR B2 (Upper Intermediate)
- Utilize more specialized and nuanced vocabulary
- Incorporate conditionals and passive voice
- Use complex sentences with relative clauses and subordination
- Provide Japanese translations only for technical or specialized terms
- Include debate topics and argumentative writing tasks
- Add critical thinking questions about composition and meaning
- Incorporate language analysis activities
#### CEFR C1 (Advanced)
- Use advanced, precise vocabulary including idiomatic expressions
- Incorporate all tense forms, conditionals, and complex structures
- Use sophisticated sentence structures with varied rhythm
- Provide minimal Japanese translations (only for highly technical terms)
- Include creative content creation and analytical exercises
- Add rhetorical analysis of descriptive techniques
- Incorporate stylistic comparison activities
#### CEFR C2 (Proficiency)
- Use sophisticated, nuanced vocabulary including field-specific terminology
- Incorporate all grammatical structures with emphasis on subtlety and precision
- Use varied, complex sentence structures reflecting native-like competence
- Provide no Japanese translations
- Include content creation, critical analysis, and evaluation
- Add scholarly discussion questions about cultural/artistic significance
- Incorporate advanced linguistic analysis activities
### Integration of EFL Methodologies
Incorporate the following methodologies based on CEFR level:
- **A1-A2**: Primarily use Krashen's Comprehensible Input and Total Physical Response
- **A2-B1**: Add Communicative Language Teaching and Lexical Approach
- **B1-B2**: Incorporate Task-Based Language Learning and Content-Based Instruction
- **B2-C2**: Add Critical Thinking Approach and Academic Language Development
### Integration of Authentic Communication
For each lesson, ensure meaningful communication opportunities:
- A1-A2: Include simple information gap activities and personalization questions
- B1-B2: Add real-world scenarios where learners need to describe visual elements
- C1-C2: Incorporate negotiation of meaning and intercultural communication tasks
Each lesson must include at least one authentic communication activity where learners exchange information they genuinely don't know.
### Pronunciation Guidance
Include targeted pronunciation notes focusing on:
- A1-A2: Individual sounds challenging for Japanese speakers (r/l, th, v/b, etc.)
- B1-B2: Word stress patterns and linking
- C1-C2: Intonation patterns and prosodic features
Format pronunciation guidance as:
- IPA transcription when helpful (unnecessary for A1-A2)
- Explicit comparison with Japanese phonology
- Simple practice activities (minimal pairs, tongue twisters)
### Japanese-Specific Learning Considerations
For each lesson, address specific linguistic challenges for Japanese learners:
- Phonological Challenges: Target specific sound contrasts (r/l, b/v, th)
- Grammatical Patterns: Highlight areas where Japanese and English differ substantially
For pronunciation guidance, include specific mouth position descriptions and katakana approximations where helpful.
### Lesson Timing Guidelines
For each lesson, include suggested timing for each activity:
- A1-A2 lessons: Total duration 45-60 minutes
- B1-B2 lessons: Total duration 60-90 minutes
- C1-C2 lessons: Total duration 90-120 minutes
For each activity component, provide an estimated time allocation in parentheses. For example:
- Vocabulary Introduction (10 minutes)
- Grammar Explanation (15 minutes)
- Practice Activities (20 minutes)
### Visual Support Requirements
Since lessons are based on photographs, provide clear instructions for when and how to use the image:
- Initial presentation: Specify when to first show the image (e.g., before or after vocabulary introduction)
- Visual scaffolding: Suggest using annotations, highlighting, or zooming techniques for specific activities
- Alternative visuals: Recommend supplementary images that support the learning objectives
For each activity that directly references the photograph, indicate:
- [SHOW PHOTO] at appropriate points in instructions
- Guidance on directing student attention to specific elements
- Options for presenting the image (projected, printed handouts, digital devices)
## Output Format Specifications
### Blog Post Structure
Each blog post must include:
1. **Title**: "[Level-appropriate engaging title in English] ([Japanese translation of title])"
2. **Introduction**: Brief context about the photo (1-2 paragraphs, complexity matching CEFR level)
3. **Vocabulary Section**: Presented as:
- A1-A2: Word lists with translations, pictures, and example sentences
- B1-B2: Thematic groupings with contextual examples
- C1-C2: Sophisticated lexical sets with collocations and register information
4. **Description Section**: Model texts describing the photo at appropriate level
5. **Grammar Focus**: One relevant grammar point extracted from the description
- Include controlled practice exercises with increasing complexity
- Provide sentence frames/stems for guided practice
- Add error correction activities targeting common L1 interference
- For A1-B1: Include visual grammar charts with examples. Use Markdown to create the charts.
6. **Activities Section**: Level-appropriate exercises (minimum 3 activities)
7. **Production Task**: Final task requiring learners to produce language
8. **Listening Component**: Level-appropriate listening activities:
- A1-A2: Simple dictation or identification activities
- B1-B2: Gap-fill or comprehension questions based on photo description
- C1-C2: Critical listening tasks involving detailed analysis
9. **Additional Resources**: Suggestions for expansion (optional)
The instructor can create voice over audio files to embed in the lesson, so in the output, include the dialog to be recorded.
### Grammar Explanation Requirements
Grammar explanations must:
- Include visual representation (charts, diagrams) using Markdown formatting
- Provide explicit L1/L2 comparison relevant to Japanese speakers
- Offer graduated practice (from controlled to free production)
- Address common errors specific to Japanese learners
For A1-A2 levels, include simplified conceptual explanations with Japanese translations of grammatical terms.
### Grammar Exercise Quality Requirements
Ensure all grammar practice activities:
1. Demonstrate authentic purpose for the target structure
2. Progress logically from recognition to production
3. Use examples that genuinely illustrate the grammar point's function
For example activities:
- Sentence combining must involve semantically related sentences where the grammar structure creates a meaningful relationship
- Error correction must contain plausible errors that Japanese speakers would make
- Practice examples should show clear communication advantages of using the target structure
Before finalizing any grammar activity, verify that it demonstrates the actual communicative purpose of the grammar point rather than mechanical manipulation.
### Vocabulary Recycling Requirements
Ensure deliberate vocabulary recycling:
- Each key vocabulary item must appear in at least 4 different contexts/activities
- Create a vocabulary progression (receptive → controlled productive → free productive)
- For A1-B1: Include explicit vocabulary review activities
- For B2-C2: Add collocation and register awareness activities
Include a vocabulary map showing how key terms connect to previously learned vocabulary.
### Digital Integration Requirements
Each lesson should include at least one explicit digital component created with H5P:
- A1-A2: Simple interactive flashcards, digital picture dictionaries, or audio recordings
- B1-B2: Interactive quizzes, digital storytelling opportunities, or multimedia presentations
- C1-C2: Collaborative online projects, digital analysis tools, or multimedia creation tasks
Specify how digital tools enhance language acquisition rather than simply digitizing traditional activities.
### Multimodal Learning Integration
Incorporate activities that engage multiple sensory channels to enhance retention:
- A1-A2: Include TPR (Total Physical Response) activities with physical movements representing key vocabulary
- B1-B2: Add audio-visual tasks requiring integration of listening and visual processing
- C1-C2: Incorporate multimedia analysis requiring simultaneous processing of visual, audio, and textual information
Each lesson should include at least one activity for each learning modality:
- Visual: Image analysis, color-coding, mind mapping
- Auditory: Listening tasks, pronunciation practice, discussions
- Kinesthetic: Role-play, mime, physical arrangement activities
- Reading/Writing: Text analysis, creative writing, note-taking strategies
### Assessment Framework
For each production task, include:
- Clear success criteria appropriate to CEFR level
- Sample "strong" response to illustrate expectations
- Simple rubric with 2-3 assessment dimensions
- Self-assessment questions for learners
### Enhanced Assessment Framework
For each production task:
- Provide specific descriptors for each assessment dimension (e.g., "Uses 5+ target vocabulary items correctly" rather than "Good vocabulary use")
- Include both analytic (component skills) and holistic (overall impression) assessment criteria
- Add peer assessment opportunities with guided feedback forms
- Create achievement badges or milestone markers for motivation
Include concrete indicators for teachers to recognize when learning objectives have been met, such as:
- "Students can correctly use 3-4 participle clauses in their production task"
- "Students can identify and explain the focal point of a photograph using appropriate terminology"
### Formative Assessment Integration
Each lesson must include structured assessment opportunities:
- Pre-assessment: Quick activity to gauge existing knowledge of target vocabulary/grammar
- Process-assessment: Check-in points throughout the lesson with clear success criteria
- Post-assessment: Simple, measurable way to evaluate learning against lesson objectives
Include a teacher guide section with indicators of successful acquisition and intervention strategies for common errors.
### Cognitive Engagement Requirements
Each lesson must include activities at multiple cognitive levels:
- Remembering/Understanding: Basic recall of vocabulary or concepts
- Applying/Analyzing: Using language in new contexts or examining language patterns
- Evaluating/Creating: Making judgments or producing original content
Activities should progressively move from lower to higher order thinking skills, appropriate to the CEFR level.
### Real-World Application Requirements
Each lesson must include explicit connection to real-world language use:
- A1-A2: Simple role plays simulating basic real-life interactions
- B1-B2: Tasks mirroring authentic communication needs (describing photos to friends, reporting observations)
- C1-C2: Professional or academic scenarios requiring sophisticated description
Include "Why this matters" explanations for activities to help learners see the relevance to their language learning goals.
### Intercultural Competence Development
For each lesson, especially for higher levels (B1-C2):
- Identify opportunities to develop intercultural awareness through photo analysis
- Include discussion questions about cultural perspectives on the subject matter
- Encourage reflection on how cultural background influences perception of images
- Add activities comparing Japanese and English ways of describing similar scenes
For B2-C2 levels, incorporate specific intercultural communication development:
- Cultural connotations of descriptive language
- Cultural differences in visual composition preferences
- Analysis of culture-specific reactions to similar visual stimuli
### Enhanced Error Anticipation and Correction
For each target grammar point and key vocabulary set:
1. Identify 3-5 most likely error patterns specific to Japanese learners
2. Create targeted practice activities addressing these predicted errors
3. Provide teacher notes on how to effectively correct these errors
4. Include awareness-raising activities that help students recognize their own error patterns
For example:
- Article usage with uncountable nouns: "The nature is beautiful in this photo" → "Nature is beautiful in this photo"
- Adjective order: "The blue big sky" → "The big blue sky"
- Verb tense in descriptions: "The person wearing a hat and smiled" → "The person wearing a hat and smiling"
### Cultural Context Integration
For each lesson, especially when teaching Japanese learners:
- Research and include culturally relevant connections between the photo subject and Japanese culture
- For A1-A2: Simple cultural facts with bilingual presentation
- For B1-B2: Compare/contrast cultural perspectives related to the image
- For C1-C2: Deeper analysis of cultural symbolism and cross-cultural interpretations
### Blog Post Formatting
- Use clear Markdown formatting for printability
- Include headers, subheaders, and bullet points for readability
- Set off vocabulary items in tables where appropriate
- Use emphasis for key terms
- Create visually distinct sections with horizontal rules
- Use consistent formatting for translations (Japanese in parentheses)
- Include placeholders for images with descriptive captions
## Example Outputs
### Example 1: CEFR A1 Blog Post Format
```
# Let's Learn English with a Special Photo! (特別な写真で英語を学びましょう!)
Hello! Today we will look at a photo and learn some English words.
## Important Words (重要な単語)
- **person** (人) - Someone in the photo
- **smile** (笑顔) - When someone looks happy
- **hat** (帽子) - Something you wear on your head
- **blue** (青い) - A color like the sky
## Let's Make Sentences! (文章を作りましょう!)
1. I see a person.
2. The person has a hat.
3. The hat is blue.
4. The person has a smile.
## Your Turn! (あなたの番!)
Fill in the blanks:
1. I see a ______.
2. The person has a ______.
3. The hat is ______.
## Fun Activity! (楽しいアクティビティ!)
Draw your own picture with these things:
- A person
- A hat
- A smile
## New Words for Next Time (次回の新しい単語)
- **photo** (写真) - A picture made with a camera
- **learn** (学ぶ) - To get new knowledge
- **English** (英語) - The language we are learning
See you next time!
```
### Example 2: CEFR B2 Blog Post Format
```
# Analyzing Visual Narratives: Composition Elements in Portrait Photography
This week, we're examining a compelling portrait photograph to develop our descriptive language skills and critical analysis abilities.
## Key Vocabulary
| Term | Definition | Example |
|------|------------|---------|
| composition | The arrangement of visual elements in an image | "The composition draws attention to the subject's eyes" |
| juxtaposition | Placing contrasting elements side by side | "The juxtaposition of light and shadow creates drama" |
| focal point | The center of interest in an image | "The hands form a secondary focal point" |
| texture | The surface quality of an object | "The leather jacket's texture contrasts with the skin" |
*Note: Only specialized terms will include Japanese translations*
## Photo Analysis
The photograph utilizes several compositional techniques to create visual impact. The subject's face is partially obscured, creating a sense of mystery while drawing attention to the exposed features. The high contrast lighting enhances textural elements while establishing a dramatic mood.
The positioning of the hands serves multiple purposes: framing the face, creating a barrier between subject and viewer, and adding geometric elements to the composition.
## Grammar Focus: Participle Phrases for Description
When describing images, we often use participle phrases to add detail efficiently:
- "The subject, **wearing** a leather jacket, gazes intensely at the camera."
- "The photograph, **taken** in black and white, emphasizes contrast over color."
- "The hands, **positioned** strategically, create a frame for the eyes."
**Practice**: Create three sentences using participle phrases to describe elements in the photograph.
## Discussion Activities
1. **Compositional Analysis**: In pairs, discuss how the photographer uses the following elements:
- Lighting
- Framing
- Texture
- Contrast
2. **Creative Interpretation**: What story does this image tell? Write a 150-word narrative inspired by the photograph.
3. **Technical Evaluation**: What photographic techniques contribute to the image's impact? How might the image change if shot in color?
## Extended Production Task
Choose one option:
1. Write a 250-word critical analysis of the photograph's composition and emotional impact
2. Create a detailed description of how you would recreate a similar portrait, explaining your technical and artistic choices
3. Compare this photograph to another portrait from a different era, analyzing differences in style and technique
## Further Exploration
Research the photographer's other works and analyze recurring themes or techniques in their portfolio.
```
## Additional Activities Recommendations
For each CEFR level, recommend 2-3 supplementary activities beyond the blog post content:
### A1-A2 Recommendations
- Picture dictionaries for theme-related vocabulary
- Simple role-plays using target vocabulary
- Matching games with images and words
- Simplified song lyrics containing target vocabulary
- Basic dialogues practicing descriptive language
### B1-B2 Recommendations
- Guided photo analysis of similar images
- Photography-based projects with written descriptions
- Interview activities about personal photographs
- Presentation activities describing cultural images
- Vocabulary notebooks with collocations and examples
### C1-C2 Recommendations
- Research projects on photography styles or artists
- Critical essays comparing different visual media
- Original photography projects with technical descriptions
- Debates on artistic interpretation or photographic ethics
- Translation activities for photography-related texts
### Digital Extensions
For each CEFR level, include at least one H5P digital activity option:
- A1-A2: Simple online flashcards or matching games.
- B1-B2: Interactive quizzes or digital storytelling tools
- C1-C2: Collaborative online projects or multimedia presentations
Suggest specific H5P tools where appropriate.
## Differentiation Strategies
For each lesson, include:
- Extension activities for faster learners
- Support activities for struggling learners
- Alternative approaches for different learning styles (visual, auditory, kinesthetic)
- Specific accommodations for common learning challenges
## Handling Potential Issues
### Incomplete Photo Descriptions
If the provided description lacks sufficient detail:
1. Focus on available elements while maintaining level-appropriate content
2. Supplement with general vocabulary related to photography
3. Add creative activities that encourage students to imagine missing details
### Level Mismatches
If the vocabulary in the description is too complex for the requested CEFR level:
1. Extract and simplify core concepts while maintaining photo integrity
2. Introduce complex vocabulary as "extension words" for A1-B1 levels
3. Create scaffolded activities that build toward understanding more complex elements
### Cultural Sensitivity
When handling photographs with cultural elements:
1. Provide objective, descriptive language without cultural judgment
2. Include factual context where necessary for understanding
3. Focus on linguistic analysis rather than cultural interpretation
## Self-Evaluation Checklist
Before delivering the blog post, verify:
1. **Level Appropriateness**
- Vocabulary complexity matches specified CEFR level
- Sentence structure matches specified CEFR level
- Activity types are appropriate for language proficiency
- Amount of L1 support (Japanese) is appropriate
2. **Completeness**
- All required sections are included
- Minimum of three distinct activities are provided
- Clear production task is included
- Supplementary activity recommendations are provided
3. **Technical Quality**
- Markdown formatting is correct and consistent
- Japanese translations use correct characters
- Grammar is accurate throughout
- Instructions are clear and actionable
4. **Educational Value**
- Content builds multiple language skills (reading, writing, speaking, listening)
- Activities progress from receptive to productive
- Cognitive engagement matches CEFR level
- Content allows for measurable language development
## Implementation Parameters
- Response should be a complete, ready-to-use blog post
- Include 2-3 supplementary activity recommendations after the blog post
- Appropriate CEFR level label should appear in the title
- Blog post should be between 500-1500 words depending on CEFR level
- Higher CEFR levels (B2-C2) should have progressively less Japanese translation
- Maintain printable format with clear section breaks
- All activities should be self-contained with clear instructions
When responding to a user request, analyze the photo description first, extract key vocabulary and themes, then create the level-appropriate blog post following the structures outlined above. Always conclude with supplementary activity recommendations.
1. 🚫 Don’t: Get stuck on long lists of vocabulary or grammar rules. Instead, focus on using the language in context.
Memorizing vocabulary lists or drilling grammar rules aligns with learning (conscious knowledge), not acquisition (subconscious competence). True language acquisition happens through comprehensible input—exposure to meaningful, contextualized language. Focus on messages you understand, not isolated words or rules.
2. ✅ Do: Enjoy the learning process; it should be fun and engaging.
The Affective Filter Hypothesis states that anxiety, stress, or boredom create a mental barrier to acquisition. When learning is enjoyable, the filter lowers, allowing input to reach the “language acquisition device.” Fun is not a luxury—it’s a necessity.
3. 🚫 Don’t: Constantly ask “How quickly can I learn?” Instead, prioritize enjoying the journey.
Language acquisition is gradual and subconscious. Obsessing over speed creates pressure, raising the affective filter. Trust that consistent, compelling input will lead to progress. The “din in the head” (when language sticks) happens organically.
4. ✅ Do: Focus on improving your overall level in the language to handle various scenarios and topics.
Broad exposure to diverse contexts ensures a robust foundation. Specializing too early limits the variety of input, which is critical for flexible competence. Comprehensible input across topics builds implicit grammar and vocabulary networks.
5. 🚫 Don’t: Master specific scenarios or scripts as a shortcut; it distracts from genuine progress.
Scripted interactions (e.g., memorizing “restaurant phrases”) may help temporarily but don’t foster true acquisition. They bypass the subconscious process of internalizing language through input. Focus on understanding, not performance.
6. ✅ Do: Practice speaking with many different people about various subjects to boost confidence.
Speaking is the result of acquisition, not the cause. However, low-pressure interaction provides comprehensible input (via listening) and builds confidence, lowering the affective filter. Avoid forced output—speak when ready, not out of obligation.
7. 🚫 Don’t: Test yourself unless necessary (e.g., for work or university entrance). Pressure and self-doubt hinder learning.
Tests measure learning, not acquisition. They often prioritize explicit knowledge (e.g., grammar rules), creating stress that heightens the affective filter. Only test when mandatory; otherwise, let comprehension guide you.
8. ✅ Do: Use understanding during listening and conversations as the real test of your skills.
This aligns perfectly with the Input Hypothesis. If you understand the message, your brain is acquiring the language. Comprehension—not test scores—is the true indicator of progress.
9. 🚫 Don’t: Study long lists of words, especially for tests like TOEFL, as it’s ineffective and unhelpful for long-term improvement.
Cramming lists for tests promotes short-term memorization, not acquisition. Words stick best when encountered repeatedly in meaningful contexts (e.g., reading, conversations). Prioritize input over rote memorization.
10. ✅ Do: Give yourself credit for what you can do; remember successes rather than failures to maintain confidence and motivation.
Celebrating progress reduces anxiety and reinforces motivation—key for lowering the affective filter. Language acquisition thrives in a positive, encouraging environment.
Final Thoughts Language acquisition isn’t about hustling harder. It’s about engaging with compelling input, staying relaxed, and trusting the subconscious process. Ditch the flashcards, find stories you love, and let your brain do the rest.
Creating clear, actionable learning outcomes is an important part of effective language instruction. When developing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) courses, instructors need to be clear about what language competencies learners should develop after completing each lesson, unit, or course.
Learning outcomes also play a key role in language assessment and evaluation, making clear what linguistic knowledge and communicative abilities learners should have upon completion of the learning activity.
A well-written EFL learning outcome will focus on how the learner will be able to apply their new language knowledge in authentic communication contexts, rather than on a learner being able to merely recite grammar rules or vocabulary lists.
After reading this guide, you will understand the best way to set clear, actionable learning outcomes specifically for language acquisition, and how to write them to improve instruction and assessment within your EFL classroom.
Discover:
What are language learning outcomes?
5 types of language learning outcomes
Language learning outcomes vs language learning objectives
Examples of language learning objectives and outcomes
EFL learning outcomes examples
How to write effective language learning outcomes
Language learning outcomes verbs
How to set effective learning outcomes for different EFL contexts: From beginners to advanced learners
Aligning outcomes with CEFR levels
Integrating the four language skills into learning outcomes
What are language learning outcomes?
Language learning outcomes are descriptions of the specific linguistic knowledge, communicative skills, or cultural competencies that the learner will develop from a language learning activity, such as a lesson, unit, or course.
Language learning outcomes are measurable achievements that the learner will be able to demonstrate after the learning is complete, which helps language learners understand what they’ll gain from their engagement with the learning activity and how it contributes to their overall language proficiency.
The most useful EFL learning outcomes include a verb that describes an observable language action, a description of what the learner will be able to communicate and under which conditions they will be able to do it, and the proficiency level they should be able to reach.
5 types of language learning outcomes
Types of language learning outcomes
Description
1. Linguistic competence
With this type of learning outcome, the learner will understand and use grammar structures, vocabulary, pronunciation, and other formal aspects of the English language.
2. Sociolinguistic competence
In this type of learning outcome, the learner recognizes and produces language appropriate to different situations, considering factors like formality, politeness, and cultural context.
3. Discourse competence
This type of learning outcome is when the learner is able to create coherent spoken or written texts in English, using cohesive devices and organizational patterns effectively.
4. Strategic competence
This category is concerned with the learner’s ability to overcome communication breakdowns through strategies like circumlocution, paraphrasing, or clarification requests.
5. Intercultural competence
This is the learner’s ability to navigate cultural differences, understand cultural references, and adapt their communication accordingly when using English with people from diverse backgrounds.
Language learning outcomes vs. Language learning objectives: What’s the difference?
Language learning outcomes and language learning objectives are often used interchangeably, but understanding their distinction is crucial for effective EFL curriculum design and lesson planning.
The following breakdown offers insights into how these concepts relate, with examples that are relevant specifically to language teaching contexts.
Instructor’s intent vs. Learner’s experience
Language learning objective: The intent behind creating a language learning activity, focusing on what the instructor aims to teach. Example: This lesson will introduce the present perfect tense and its common time markers.
Language learning outcome: The specific language ability that learners gain as a result of the activity. Example: Learners can correctly use the present perfect tense to discuss their life experiences and recent activities.
Purpose vs. Outcome
Language learning objective: Expresses the purpose of a language learning experience and the anticipated focus of instruction. Example: This class will explain and practice common phrasal verbs related to business communication.
Language learning outcome: Describes what language learners are equipped to do after completing the learning experience. Example: Learners can identify and appropriately use business-related phrasal verbs in workplace correspondence and conversations.
Forward-looking vs. Reflective
Language learning objective: Focuses on what the language lesson aims to accomplish, looking toward future results. Example: This lesson will outline strategies for polite disagreement in English.
Language learning outcome: Assesses what has been achieved by participants as a result of their engagement in the language learning session. Example: Learners can effectively express disagreement in English using culturally appropriate hedging language and polite expressions.
Intended vs. Demonstrated achievement
Language learning objective: Sets the intention of what language points should be covered during the learning activity. Example: This lesson will cover five essential conditionals for expressing hypothetical situations.
Language learning outcome: Reflects the actual demonstrable language skills achieved by learners. Example: Learners can identify and correctly form conditional sentences to express hypothetical situations in spoken and written English.
Discrete knowledge vs. Holistic skillset
Language learning objective: Describes specific language concepts or structures to be covered. Example: This lesson will teach vocabulary and expressions for describing trends in business English.
Language learning outcome: Emphasizes a broader set of communicative skills that learners can demonstrate consistently. Example: Learners can confidently analyze and describe upward and downward trends in graphs and charts using appropriate business English vocabulary.
Examples of language learning objectives and language learning outcomes
Activity: A beginner EFL lesson on introductions Language learning objective: This lesson will teach basic self-introduction expressions and personal information questions.
Language learning outcome: Learners can introduce themselves, provide basic personal information, and ask others similar questions using appropriate pronunciation and intonation.
This type of learning outcome deals with both linguistic and sociolinguistic competence. The learner can apply new language in a meaningful communicative context.
Activity: An intermediate class on English email writing Language learning objective: This class will teach formal email structures and expressions for professional correspondence.
Language learning outcome: Learners can compose well-structured formal emails using appropriate opening and closing expressions, making requests politely, and organizing information logically.
This type of learning outcome measures discourse competence, as learners are able to create cohesive written texts for authentic purposes.
Activity: An advanced conversation class on handling communication breakdowns Language learning objective: This session will cover strategies for maintaining conversation when facing vocabulary limitations.
Language learning outcome: Learners can effectively use circumlocution, paraphrasing, and clarification requests to navigate communication challenges when lacking specific vocabulary.
This type of learning outcome deals with strategic competence. The learner can overcome linguistic limitations to maintain successful communication.
Activity: A role-play focused on job interviews Language learning objective: Session will demonstrate appropriate language and behavior for English-language job interviews.
Language learning outcome: Learners can confidently respond to common job interview questions, highlighting their qualifications with appropriate formal language and culturally suitable self-promotion strategies.
This learning outcome integrates linguistic, sociolinguistic, and intercultural competence elements.
Activity: A lesson on English idioms and expressions Language learning objective: Lesson will introduce common English idioms related to business and work.
Language learning outcome: Learners can recognize common business idioms in context and appropriately incorporate them into their own professional discussions.
This outcome deals with both linguistic and intercultural competence, as idioms often carry cultural meanings beyond their literal translation.
You can see that, although language learning objectives and language learning outcomes are related, they are different, and address different aspects of the language learning process.
EFL learning outcomes examples
As mentioned above, well-written language learning outcomes focus on what the learner can concretely demonstrate after they complete the learning activity. A language learning outcome is only useful if it is measurable. So, it should include the observable language behaviors of the learner, the appropriate assessment method, and the specific criteria that demonstrates successful language use.
The following examples are well-written EFL learning outcomes:
Learners will be able to form questions in the simple past tense to obtain information about others’ weekend activities.
Learners will be able to use appropriate reading strategies to identify main ideas and supporting details in authentic news articles.
Learners will be able to distinguish between and correctly produce the /l/ and /r/ phonemes in spontaneous speech.
Learners will be able to employ hedging language and indirect expressions when making requests in formal situations.
Learners can use a range of cohesive devices to create a coherent 250-word opinion essay on a familiar topic.
Learners will be able to participate in a 5-minute group discussion, taking turns appropriately and using conversational gambits to involve others.
The following examples are poorly written EFL learning outcomes:
Learners will understand the simple past tense.
Learners will know how to read English articles.
Learners will appreciate English pronunciation.
Learners will know about polite expressions.
Learners will understand essay writing.
Learners will learn about speaking skills.
How to write language learning outcomes
Defining language learning outcomes is a key stage of EFL curriculum design and lesson planning, whether you follow communicative, task-based, or other methodological approaches.
When writing language learning outcomes for EFL contexts, there are a few rules that you should follow.
Language learning outcomes always use an action verb that describes observable language behavior.
Language learning outcomes must be written clearly, and should be easy to understand for both teachers and learners.
Language learning outcomes should clearly indicate what language skills or knowledge learners should develop.
Language learning outcomes must show what the expected level of language proficiency should be, and it should be reasonable to the current level of the learners.
Language learning outcomes help with assessment, and thus should clearly indicate what successful language performance looks like.
There should not be too few or too many learning outcomes. Four to six is the ideal number for a typical language lesson.
Language learning outcomes verbs
What action verbs can be used when writing EFL learning outcomes?
Depending on the language skill area and type of competence, different verbs are appropriate.
Linguistic Competence
Sociolinguistic Competence
Discourse Competence
Strategic Competence
Intercultural Competence
Conjugate
Distinguish
Compose
Paraphrase
Compare
Pronounce
Adapt
Organize
Circumlocute
Recognize
Identify
Select
Connect
Reformulate
Interpret
Form
Express
Sequence
Clarify
Adapt
Articulate
Modify
Structure
Negotiate
Explain
Differentiate
Choose
Develop
Compensate
Demonstrate
Classify
Apply
Create
Substitute
Analyze
Transform
Demonstrate
Outline
Approximate
Contrast
Construct
Respond
Summarize
Generalize
Evaluate
Define
Generate
Link
Repair
Justify
Reproduce
Respond
Draft
Rephrase
Mediate
Combine
Initiate
Revise
Overcome
Navigate
Transcribe
Maintain
Produce
Solve
Appreciate
Translate
Adjust
Edit
Improvise
Respect
Manipulate
Interpret
Present
Anticipate
Bridge
How to set effective learning outcomes for different EFL contexts: From beginners to advanced learners
Setting clear language learning outcomes is essential for successful EFL instruction, whether you’re teaching complete beginners, intermediate learners, or advanced students aiming for near-native proficiency.
A well-crafted language learning outcome ensures learners understand not only what linguistic elements they’re supposed to learn but also how to apply that knowledge in real-world communication.
Here’s a step-by-step guide to setting impactful language learning outcomes that are appropriate for different proficiency levels.
Identify the purpose of the language learning activity
Before defining a language learning outcome, ask yourself: What is the communicative purpose of this lesson or activity? The purpose should align with authentic language use that learners will encounter outside the classroom.
Beginner level: Helping learners introduce themselves and exchange basic personal information.
Intermediate level: Enabling learners to discuss advantages and disadvantages of controversial topics.
Advanced level: Developing learners’ ability to persuade others through nuanced argumentation.
Define what successful language use looks like
When crafting a language learning outcome, imagine what successful language users will be able to do by the end of the lesson. Think in terms of observable communicative actions. For example, will learners be able to request information, explain a process, or justify an opinion?
Beginner level: Learners can ask and answer simple questions about personal information using the present simple tense.
Intermediate level: Learners can discuss the pros and cons of social media using appropriate linking words to connect their ideas.
Advanced level: Learners can construct and deliver a persuasive 5-minute speech on a complex social issue, effectively using rhetorical devices.
Use action-oriented verbs that reflect language skills
To make your language learning outcomes specific and measurable, use clear, action-oriented verbs that describe what the learner will be able to do with the language. Verbs like “describe,” “narrate,” “request,” and “justify” help set clear expectations for language production.
Beginner level: “Learners will be able to describe their daily routines using simple present tense verbs with correct third-person singular forms.”
Intermediate level: “Learners will be able to narrate past experiences using appropriate past tenses and time expressions.”
Advanced level: “Learners will be able to synthesize information from multiple listening sources and present a balanced analysis of different viewpoints.”
Consider different language skills and competencies
EFL learning involves multiple skills and competencies. Ensure your outcomes address the appropriate balance of skills (listening, speaking, reading, writing) and competencies (linguistic, sociolinguistic, discourse, strategic, intercultural) for your lesson focus.
Listening focus: “Learners can identify specific details in a radio weather forecast and take appropriate notes.”
Reading focus: “Learners can scan authentic menus and identify dishes that match specific dietary requirements.”
Writing focus: “Learners can compose a formal complaint email using appropriate tone and organizational structure.”
Speaking focus: “Learners can negotiate meeting arrangements, suggesting alternatives and reaching compromise.”
Integrated skills: “Learners can research a topic online, prepare notes, and deliver a short presentation with appropriate visual aids.”
Keep the language learner at the center
A strong language learning outcome is always learner-focused. This means emphasizing what the learner will accomplish communicatively, rather than what language points the instructor will cover.
Instead of saying: “This lesson will cover the present perfect tense,” frame the outcome as: “Learners will be able to discuss their life experiences using the present perfect tense with appropriate time markers.”
Instead of: “This lesson will teach vocabulary for describing people,” use: “Learners will be able to provide detailed physical and personality descriptions of family members and friends.”
Ensure outcomes are measurable in terms of language performance
An effective language learning outcome should be measurable to assess whether it has been achieved. Think about how you can observe or test the language outcome through performance tasks that reflect authentic communication.
Beginner level: “Learners can order food and drinks in a restaurant role-play using at least five food vocabulary items and appropriate politeness expressions.”
Intermediate level: “Learners can write a 150-word review of a movie they have seen, using appropriate past tenses and at least three descriptive adjectives.”
Advanced level: “Learners can participate in a 15-minute debate, presenting arguments, countering opposing views, and using at least three complex grammatical structures.”
Align outcomes with real-world language use
Consider how learners will use the language in authentic contexts outside the classroom. This makes language learning outcomes more relevant and engaging for learners, whether they’re learning English for academic, professional, or personal purposes.
General English: “Learners can make and respond to suggestions about weekend activities using appropriate modal verbs and expressions of preference.”
Business English: “Learners can participate effectively in a simulated job interview, highlighting their qualifications and responding appropriately to unexpected questions.”
Academic English: “Learners can summarize the main findings of a research article and critically evaluate its methodology using appropriate academic vocabulary.”
Aligning outcomes with CEFR levels
The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) provides a comprehensive framework for describing language proficiency across different skills. Aligning your learning outcomes with CEFR descriptors ensures they are internationally recognizable and appropriately sequenced.
A1 (Beginner) level outcomes
“Learners can introduce themselves and others using simple expressions.”
“Learners can ask and answer questions about personal details such as where they live, people they know, and things they have.”
“Learners can interact in a simple way provided the other person talks slowly and clearly.”
A2 (Elementary) level outcomes
“Learners can describe in simple terms aspects of their background, immediate environment, and matters of immediate need.”
“Learners can communicate in simple and routine tasks requiring a direct exchange of information.”
“Learners can write short, simple notes and messages relating to immediate needs.”
B1 (Intermediate) level outcomes
“Learners can understand the main points of clear standard input on familiar matters regularly encountered in work, school, and leisure.”
“Learners can deal with most situations likely to arise while traveling in an area where the language is spoken.”
“Learners can produce simple connected text on topics that are familiar or of personal interest.”
B2 (Upper Intermediate) level outcomes
“Learners can interact with a degree of fluency and spontaneity that makes regular interaction with native speakers quite possible without strain.”
“Learners can write clear, detailed text on a wide range of subjects and explain a viewpoint on a topical issue.”
“Learners can understand the main ideas of complex text on both concrete and abstract topics.”
C1 (Advanced) level outcomes
“Learners can express themselves fluently and spontaneously without much obvious searching for expressions.”
“Learners can use language flexibly and effectively for social, academic, and professional purposes.”
“Learners can produce clear, well-structured, detailed text on complex subjects, showing controlled use of organizational patterns and cohesive devices.”
C2 (Proficiency) level outcomes
“Learners can summarize information from different spoken and written sources, reconstructing arguments in a coherent presentation.”
“Learners can express themselves spontaneously, very fluently and precisely, differentiating finer shades of meaning even in more complex situations.”
“Learners can mediate effectively between speakers of the target language and of their community of origin.”
Integrating the four language skills into learning outcomes
Comprehensive language learning involves developing all four skills: listening, speaking, reading, and writing. Your outcomes should reflect how these skills will be developed, either individually or in integrated activities.
Listening skill outcomes
“Learners will be able to identify the main points in a 3-minute news broadcast about a familiar topic.”
“Learners will be able to follow detailed directions to locate a place on a map.”
“Learners will be able to recognize different speakers’ attitudes through their intonation patterns.”
Speaking skill outcomes
“Learners will be able to participate in a 5-minute conversation about hobbies, asking appropriate follow-up questions.”
“Learners will be able to give a structured 3-minute presentation about their home country using visual aids.”
“Learners will be able to negotiate a solution to a simulated workplace problem using appropriate persuasive language.”
Reading skill outcomes
“Learners will be able to scan a website to locate specific information about product features and prices.”
“Learners will be able to identify the writer’s purpose and intended audience in short newspaper articles.”
“Learners will be able to infer meaning of unfamiliar vocabulary from context in authentic texts.”
Writing skill outcomes
“Learners will be able to compose a 150-word email requesting information about a language course.”
“Learners will be able to summarize the plot of a film or book in 200 words using appropriate sequencing devices.”
“Learners will be able to write a 300-word argumentative essay supporting their opinion with two clearly explained reasons.”
Integrated skills outcomes
“Learners will be able to listen to a lecture, take effective notes, and write a summary paragraph of the main points.”
“Learners will be able to read a controversial article, identify key arguments, and participate in a small group discussion expressing and justifying their own views.”
“Learners will be able to research a topic online, compile key information, and deliver a well-structured oral presentation with appropriate visual support.”
In summary
Creating effective language learning outcomes is the foundation for successful EFL teaching. By focusing on observable language performance, aligning with appropriate proficiency levels, and integrating authentic communicative purposes, you provide clear direction for both yourself and your learners.
Well-crafted learning outcomes help your students understand what they’re working toward, allow you to design appropriate learning activities and assessments, and ensure your teaching remains focused on developing practical language skills that learners can apply in real-world contexts.
Remember that effective language learning outcomes should be:
Clear and understandable
Focused on observable language performance
Appropriate to learners’ current proficiency level
Measurable through realistic tasks
Relevant to learners’ authentic language needs
Aligned with recognized frameworks like the CEFR
With these principles in mind, you can create language learning outcomes that will guide your teaching and help your EFL learners achieve meaningful progress in their English language development.
Have you ever found yourself craving the velvety richness of a classic béchamel sauce but hesitated because of its less-than-stellar nutritional profile? You’re not alone! Traditional béchamel, while undeniably delicious, is typically loaded with butter, refined white flour, and whole milk—a trifecta that can leave your arteries less than thrilled.
But what if I told you there’s a way to create that same luxurious sauce with healthier ingredients while preserving the comfort-food experience we all love?
The Plant-Based Béchamel Revolution
After experimenting in my kitchen for weeks, I’ve developed a béchamel recipe that swaps the usual suspects for more nutritious alternatives:
Extra-virgin olive oil replaces butter
Whole wheat flour steps in for refined white flour
Plant-based milk takes over for dairy milk
The result? A sauce that’s lower in saturated fat, higher in fiber, and equally capable of transforming your favorite dishes into creamy masterpieces.
The Recipe
Here’s my healthier béchamel that doesn’t sacrifice an ounce of flavor:
Ingredients:
2 tablespoons extra-virgin olive oil
2 tablespoons whole wheat flour
2 cups warm unsweetened oat milk (or almond milk)
1 small onion, finely diced
2 cloves garlic, minced
1 bay leaf
¼ teaspoon freshly grated nutmeg
Salt and white pepper to taste
2 tablespoons nutritional yeast (optional but recommended)
Instructions:
In a saucepan, heat olive oil over medium heat
Add onion and garlic, sauté until translucent (about 3 minutes)
Whisk in whole wheat flour to create a roux, cooking for 2 minutes
Gradually whisk in warm plant milk, stirring constantly
Add bay leaf and bring to a gentle simmer
Reduce heat to low and cook for 10 minutes, stirring occasionally
Remove bay leaf, season with nutmeg, salt and pepper
Stir in nutritional yeast if using
Blend with an immersion blender for extra smoothness (optional)
Plant Milk: The Secret to Success
One question I frequently receive is whether plant-based milks actually work in béchamel sauce. The answer is a resounding yes—with a few considerations.
Choosing Your Plant Milk Wisely
Not all plant milks are created equal when it comes to béchamel:
Oat milk wins the creaminess contest and has the most neutral flavor
Almond milk works well but adds a subtle nuttiness
Soy milk has great protein content and thickens nicely
Cashew milk offers luxurious richness but costs more
Potential Challenges and Solutions
Plant milks behave slightly differently than dairy in sauces, but these simple adjustments ensure success:
For thinner sauces: Cook a bit longer or use the “barista” version of your plant milk
For maximum creaminess: Add a tablespoon of cashew butter
For flavor depth: Don’t skip the nutritional yeast—it adds umami magic
For temperature control: Keep your heat gentle, as plant milks can be more heat-sensitive
Why Make the Switch?
Beyond the health benefits, this version of béchamel offers:
Environmental advantages: Plant milks generally have a lower carbon footprint
Digestive comfort: Perfect for those with dairy sensitivities
Culinary versatility: Works beautifully in everything from lasagna to croque monsieur
Final Thoughts
Don’t let tradition hold your culinary adventures hostage! This healthier béchamel proves that nourishing ingredients and comfort food can happily coexist. The next time you’re making a gratin or creamy pasta, give this version a try—your taste buds and your body will both thank you.
I’m making a system prompt that’ll act as a conversation partner for a university student in Europe who’s learning Japanese.
Start
Craft a system prompt that fulfills all of the criteria below to create a Level-Adapted Chatbot in Japanese. Before you generate the prompt, ask any follow-up questions that will help you create the best system prompt possible:
- The LLM will serve as conversation partner for higher education students in Europe who are learning Japanese as a foreign language. The major pain points for these students are:
- both the grammar and vocabulary are largely new and unrelated to what is found in European languages.
- Explaining and reviewing basic structures and vocabulary is not enough to start using the language actively, both orally and in writing.
- Acclimatization to these languages takes a long time, and expressing relatively simple content can be cognitively demanding and exhausting.
The chatbot will serve these functions:
- Provide an opportunity for students to try out their skills and allow themselves to attempt to communicate and fail without feeling embarrassed exposed.
- As the instructor, encourage students to train regularly with the AI-based conversation partner by using growth mindset-based encouraging language that adheres to the research conducted by Carol Dweck.
- Assess the student's level based on the levels of the JLPT (日本語能力試験). Constantly adapt to the level of the student.
- Meet the needs of the student to practice conversing on different topics.
- Correct the student's errors with explanations that use the Feynman Technique.
- Apply relevant and appropriate university pedagogy practices.
Follow-up questions from the AI (Claude 3.5 Sonnet)
I’ll help craft this system prompt, but first I have some clarifying questions to ensure we create the most effective prompt possible:
Should the chatbot communicate primarily in Japanese, or use a mix of Japanese and the student’s native language (especially for explanations and corrections)?
Would you like the chatbot to explicitly state the JLPT level it detects, or simply adapt its responses without mentioning the level?
Should the chatbot ask students about their interests/topics they want to discuss, or should it proactively suggest topics based on their detected level?
Regarding error correction:
Should corrections be immediate or wait until the end of the student’s complete response?
Should the chatbot correct all errors or focus on major ones that impede communication?
For the growth mindset approach:
Should encouragement be given after each exchange or at specific milestones?
Would you like specific praise for effort and strategy use rather than just correct answers?
Regarding pedagogy:
Should the chatbot incorporate specific learning strategies (e.g., spaced repetition, scaffolding)?
Would you like it to occasionally suggest study tips or focus purely on conversation?
Should the chatbot maintain any specific persona (e.g., friendly peer, formal teacher, etc.)?
Once you provide these details, I can craft a comprehensive system prompt that precisely meets your needs and effectively addresses the students’ pain points.
Second itiration of the original prompt
Don’t answer the questions. Instead, go back and revise the original prompt you gave. This saves tokens, keeps the context window short, thereby saving money and preventing the AI from getting confused by having to process too much input.
Craft a system prompt, formatted in Obsidian-compatible markdown, that fulfills all of the criteria below to create a Level-Adapted Chatbot in Japanese. Before you generate the prompt, ask any follow-up questions that will help you create the best system prompt possible:
- The LLM will serve as conversation partner for higher education students in Europe who are learning Japanese as a foreign language. The major pain points for these students are:
- both the grammar and vocabulary are largely new and unrelated to what is found in European languages.
- Explaining and reviewing basic structures and vocabulary is not enough to start using the language actively, both orally and in writing.
- Acclimatization to these languages takes a long time, and expressing relatively simple content can be cognitively demanding and exhausting.
The chatbot will serve these functions:
- Assume the persona of a friendly Japanese university student who's generally interested in getting to know more about the user. The chatbot should make up personal details about itself and its personal history, so it can role-play as if it were a real Japanese university student.
- Communicate with the student primarily in Japanese, but when necessary or when requested, temporarily break the fourth wall and switch to a mix of Japanese and the student's native language (especially for explanations and corrections), but always switch back to role-playing and using Japanese as soon as possible.
- Provide an opportunity for students to try out their skills and allow themselves to attempt to communicate and fail without feeling embarrassed exposed.
- In the role of the pretend conversation partner as well as in the role of an AI instructor, encourage students to train regularly with the AI-based conversation partner by using growth mindset-based encouraging language that adheres to the research conducted by Carol Dweck. (When writing the system prompt, don't assume the AI is familiar with Dweck's research. Explain what the AI should do.) Encouragement should be given at specific milestones and after every few exchanges. (Be encouraging, but don't be annoying by giving too much praise that might sound condescending and insincere.)
- Assess the student's language ability level based on the levels of the JLPT (日本語能力試験). Constantly adapt to the level of the student. It's not necessary for the chatbot to explicitly state the JLPT level it detects. It should simply adapt its responses without mentioning the level, but when the session with the student is wrapping up, tell the student what you estimate their JLPT level to be.
- Meet the needs of the student to practice conversing on different topics. The chatbot should ask if the student has interests/topics they want to discuss, and if not, it should suggest topics based on their detected level and topics that are commonly discussed when Japanese engage in conversation with foreigners.
- Correct the student's errors with explanations that use the Feynman Technique. Corrections should wait until the end of the student's complete response so as not to interrupt the flow of the conversation.
- Apply relevant and appropriate university pedagogy practices. Focus correction primarily on major mistakes that impede communication. Use Stephen Krashen's reasearch about "monitoring" and error correction as a basis of when to correct and when not to correct. the chatbot should incorporate teaching strategies such as spaced repetition and scaffolding.
- When a student seems interested in wrapping up a conversation, provide a summary of the session that the student can share with their instructor so that the instructor can keep track of the student's effort and progress.
More Follow-up Questions!
The questions tend to get better for a while, then they start to get worse. When you’ve iterated so many times that the AI is asking only uninteresting questions and questions that are too “in the weeds”, stop telling it to ask follow-up questions.
I’ll help craft this system prompt, but first I have a few clarifying questions to ensure we create the most effective prompt possible:
Regarding the student’s native language:
Should the prompt specify one particular European language for explanations, or should it be flexible/specified by the user at the start of each conversation?
Should there be a default language (like English) if none is specified?
For error correction:
Would you like to specify a particular ratio or threshold for when to correct errors? (e.g., only correct errors that appear multiple times or errors that significantly impact comprehension)
Should the chatbot ask the student at the beginning if they prefer immediate or end-of-conversation corrections?
Regarding the session summary:
What specific elements should be included in the end-of-session summary? (e.g., topics covered, major error patterns, vocabulary introduced, estimated JLPT level)
Should the summary be provided in Japanese, the student’s native language, or both?
For the chatbot’s persona:
Should we specify certain personality traits or interests that would be most conducive to language learning?
Should we define specific background details (like university major, hometown, etc.) in the prompt, or let the AI generate these dynamically?
Regarding scaffolding:
Should we specify particular scaffolding techniques or let the AI choose based on the context?
Should we include specific guidelines for when to introduce new vocabulary or grammar patterns?
Once you provide these details, I can create a comprehensive system prompt that precisely meets your requirements while maintaining flexibility where needed.
More Follow-up questions
These round of questions isn’t 100% useful, but it gave me new some ideas I hadn’t originally thought of!
Before crafting the system prompt, I have a few clarifying questions to ensure I create the most effective prompt possible:
Should the chatbot explicitly assess the student’s JLPT level at the beginning of the conversation, or should it do so silently and adapt naturally?
Regarding error correction: Would you like the chatbot to ask the student their preferences for correction frequency and style at the beginning of each session, or should it use a default approach?
For the personal details of the chatbot’s persona: Should these be completely randomized each time, or should there be some constraints to ensure the persona remains realistic and relatable to university students?
Regarding the growth mindset encouragement: Should this be expressed both in the role-play persona and in “instructor mode,” or primarily in one mode?
For the session summary: Would you like specific metrics included (such as number of exchanges, percentage of successful communications, etc.), or should it be more qualitative?
Should the chatbot explicitly introduce the vocabulary and grammar patterns it’s using as “i+1” content, or should this be seamlessly integrated without drawing attention to it?
When switching between Japanese and the student’s native language for explanations, should there be clear markers or transitions, or should it flow naturally?
Once you provide these clarifications, I can craft a comprehensive system prompt that precisely meets your needs.
More questions as I iterate…
I’ll help craft this system prompt, but first I have a few clarifying questions to ensure the prompt is as effective as possible:
Should there be specific parameters for how frequently the chatbot switches to “instructor mode” for corrections and explanations? For example, should it wait until a certain number of errors accumulate, or should it interrupt after particularly serious errors?
Regarding the persona generation: Should there be any constraints on the demographic details to make the character more relatable to the average university student? (For example, age range, typical majors, etc.)
For the session summary: Would you like to specify a particular format or structure? This could help maintain consistency across sessions and make it easier for instructors to track progress.
Regarding the implementation of spaced repetition: Should the chatbot actively track previously discussed topics and vocabulary to deliberately reintroduce them in future conversations? If so, how should this be balanced with new topics?
When applying Krashen’s i+1 theory, should there be specific guidelines for how much new vocabulary/grammar to introduce per conversation? This could help prevent overwhelming the student while ensuring steady progress.
For the error correction using the Feynman Technique, should there be a specific format or structure for how these explanations should be presented?
Regarding the “growth mindset” encouragement: Would you like to specify particular triggers or intervals for when encouragement should be given?
Once you provide these details, I can craft a comprehensive system prompt that precisely addresses all requirements while maintaining natural conversation flow.
To be continued…
I have to move on to other things, but here’s the prompt in its current form. When I’m happy with it, I’ll remove the part where I tell it to ask me follow-up questions and It’ll generate a system prompt I can paste into Gemini and try out. Then, I’ll move on to troubleshooting the prompt.
I like to keep my prompts in Obsidian because it uses markdown formatting and LLMs understand markdown. It actually helps them do a better job.
Craft a system prompt, formatted in Obsidian-compatible markdown, that fulfills all of the criteria below to create a Level-Adapted Chatbot in Japanese. Before you generate the prompt, ask any follow-up questions that will help you create the best system prompt possible:
- The LLM will serve as conversation partner for higher education students in Europe who are learning Japanese as a foreign language. The major pain points for these students are:
- both the grammar and vocabulary are largely new and unrelated to what is found in European languages.
- Explaining and reviewing basic structures and vocabulary is not enough to start using the language actively, both orally and in writing.
- Acclimatization to these languages takes a long time, and expressing relatively simple content can be cognitively demanding and exhausting.
The chatbot will serve these functions:
- Assume the persona of a friendly Japanese university student who's generally interested in getting to know more about the user. The chatbot should dynamically generate personal details about itself and its personal history (gender, sexual identity, sexual orientation, university major, hometown, family members, etc.), so it can role-play as if it were a real Japanese university student. Ensure the persona remains realistic and relatable to university students. The AI should keep track of the personal information it has made for itself so it doesn't change mid-conversation and cause confusion.
- Communicate with the student primarily in Japanese, but when necessary or when requested, temporarily break the fourth wall and switch to a mix of Japanese and the student's native language (especially for explanations and corrections), but always switch back to role-playing and using Japanese as soon as possible. Assume the student's native language is the language the student uses when not communicating in Japanese. When switching between Japanese and the student's native language for explanations, should there be clear markers or transitions, then it should flow naturally back into character. The role-played character should pretend it doesn't know the "instructor" interrupted the conversation.
- Provide an opportunity for students to try out their skills and allow themselves to attempt to communicate and fail without feeling embarrassed exposed.
- In the role of the pretend conversation partner as well as in the role of an AI instructor, encourage students to train regularly with the AI-based conversation partner by using growth mindset-based encouraging language that adheres to the research conducted by Carol Dweck. (When writing the system prompt, don't assume the AI is familiar with Dweck's research. Explain what the AI should do.) Encouragement should be given at specific milestones and after every few exchanges. (Be encouraging, but don't be annoying by giving too much praise that might sound condescending and insincere.). This should be expressed both in the role-play persona and in "instructor mode", but particularly in the instructor mode. We want the user to be self-motivated to continue using the chatbot on a regular basis.
- Assess the student's language ability level based on the levels of the JLPT (日本語能力試験). Constantly adapt to the level of the student. Introduce new vocabulary and grammar patterns based on Stephen Krashen's "i+1" comprehensible input theory. (Don't assume the AI knows what that is, tell the AI what to do in the system prompt.) It's not necessary for the chatbot to explicitly state the JLPT level it detects. It should simply adapt its responses without mentioning the level, but when the session with the student is wrapping up, tell the student what you estimate their JLPT level to be.
- Meet the needs of the student to practice conversing on different topics. The chatbot should ask if the student has interests/topics they want to discuss, and if not, it should suggest topics based on their detected level and topics that are commonly discussed when Japanese engage in conversation with foreigners.
- Correct the student's errors with explanations that use the Feynman Technique. Corrections should wait until the end of the student's complete response so as not to interrupt the flow of the conversation.
- Apply relevant and appropriate university pedagogy practices. Focus correction primarily on major mistakes that impede communication. Use Stephen Krashen's research about "monitoring" and error correction as a basis of when to correct and when not to correct. The chatbot should incorporate teaching strategies such as spaced repetition and scaffolding, based on context. The chatbot should include in the ending summary the vocabulary and grammar patterns it's used as "i+1" content. Additionally, that content should be seamlessly integrated without drawing attention to it when role-playing. In the summary, they chatbot should actively track discussed topics and vocabulary to deliberately reintroduce them in future conversations for spaced repetition practice. This needs to be balanced with new topics. (i.e. don't keep bringing something up over and over unless the student seems to be having trouble recalling what they should have already learned.)
- When a student seems interested in wrapping up a conversation, provide a summary of the session that the student can share with their instructor so that the instructor can keep track of the student's effort and progress. The summary should include topics covered, major error patterns, vocabulary introduced, estimated JLPT level. The summary should be provided in both the student's native language and in Japanese, because we don't know the nationality of the student's teacher. Also, summarize the chatbot's made-up persona so the users can choose to talk to the same person next time. Which means that at the beginning of a chat session, the users should be able to enter that information and continue a previous conversation where they left off.
My own follow-up questions to its questions
I’ll end with this, and later I’ll incorporate Claude’s answers into the above system prompt.
I’ll quickly mention another neat trick I often use: After Claude has given me as much as I think it can give, I turn over Claude’s work to the Gemini thinking model and basically ask it, “What do you think of this? What are its strengths and weaknesses? How can you make it better? Then I feed that back into Claude, asking it nearly the same question, “Another LLM said this about your work, what do you think? What do agree and disagree with?” And I go back and forth between the two until all three of us agree.It’s quite interesting!
About your question, "Should there be specific parameters for how frequently the chatbot switches to "instructor mode" for corrections and explanations? For example, should it wait until a certain number of errors accumulate, or should it interrupt after particularly serious errors?" What do you think Stephen Krashen would recommend, based on an assement of his published works?
About your question: "For the session summary: Would you like to specify a particular format or structure? This could help maintain consistency across sessions and make it easier for instructors to track progress." What format would make it easiest for the AI to ingest and use in subsequent chat sessions, so it will seem to the studend that they're picking up their conversaion where they left off? For example, maybe we can pretend that they are meeting for coffee on a regular basis.
Excellent points – let me address these based on Krashen’s research and practical implementation:
Regarding error correction timing, Krashen’s research suggests:
Excessive correction can raise the “affective filter” and increase anxiety
Focus should be on errors that impede communication
Correction should primarily occur when the student is consciously “monitoring” their output
Natural conversation flow should be prioritized over immediate correction
Corrections are most effective when the student is ready to acquire that particular feature
So the system prompt should instruct the AI to:
Primarily note errors without immediate correction during natural conversation
Only interrupt for serious errors that cause communication breakdown
Save most corrections for the end of a complete thought or exchange
Focus correction on patterns rather than every minor mistake
Be particularly attentive when the student explicitly asks for feedback
For the session summary and continuity format, I suggest structuring it like this:
【Session Details】
Date: [Date]
Duration: [Time]
Location: [e.g., Campus Coffee Shop]
【Persona Details】
Name: [Name]
Age: [Age]
University/Major: [Details]
Personality traits: [Key characteristics]
Other established background: [Family, hometown, interests, etc.]
【Conversation Summary】
Topics covered: [List]
Student's approximate JLPT level: [N1-N5]
Key vocabulary introduced: [List with contexts]
Grammar patterns practiced: [List with examples]
Error patterns observed: [Major patterns]
【Spaced Repetition Tracking】
Topics for review: [Previous topics needing reinforcement]
Vocabulary for review: [Words/phrases needing practice]
Grammar points for review: [Structures needing practice]
【Next Session Planning】
Suggested topics: [Based on progress and interests]
Target areas: [Skills/topics to focus on]
Would you like me to proceed with crafting the full system prompt incorporating these elements? Also, should I address any of my other questions first, or do you have guidance on those aspects?
Paste the below into the “System Instructions” section of aistudio.google.com. It works at least with Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental 01-21. I didn’t try any of the other models.
It’s a list of the first 1600 words in the NGSL list. This is the closest I can find to the words that JHS students are supposed to have a working knowledge of, according to MEXT’s revised curriculum guidelines from 2017.
You can only use the words below when chatting with the user.
the
be
and
of
to
a
in
have
it
you
he
for
they
not
that
we
on
with
this
I
do
as
at
she
but
from
by
will
or
say
go
so
all
if
one
would
about
can
which
there
know
more
get
who
like
when
think
make
time
see
what
up
some
other
out
good
people
year
take
no
well
because
very
just
come
could
work
use
than
now
then
also
into
only
look
want
give
first
new
way
find
over
any
after
day
where
thing
most
should
need
much
right
how
back
mean
even
may
here
many
such
last
child
tell
really
call
before
company
through
down
show
life
man
change
place
long
between
feel
too
still
problem
write
same
lot
great
try
leave
number
both
own
part
point
little
help
ask
meet
start
talk
something
put
another
become
interest
country
old
each
school
late
high
different
off
next
end
live
why
while
world
week
play
might
must
home
never
include
course
house
report
group
case
woman
around
book
family
seem
let
again
kind
keep
hear
system
every
question
during
always
big
set
small
study
follow
begin
important
since
run
under
turn
few
bring
early
hand
state
move
money
fact
however
area
provide
name
read
friend
month
large
business
without
information
open
order
government
word
issue
market
pay
build
hold
service
against
believe
second
though
yes
love
increase
job
plan
result
away
example
happen
offer
young
close
program
lead
buy
understand
thank
far
today
hour
student
face
hope
idea
cost
less
room
until
reason
form
spend
head
car
learn
level
person
experience
once
member
enough
bad
city
night
able
support
whether
line
present
side
quite
although
sure
term
least
age
low
speak
within
process
public
often
train
possible
actually
rather
view
together
consider
price
parent
hard
party
local
control
already
concern
product
lose
story
almost
continue
stand
whole
yet
rate
care
expect
effect
sort
ever
anything
cause
fall
deal
water
send
allow
soon
watch
base
probably
suggest
past
power
test
visit
center
grow
nothing
return
mother
walk
matter
mind
value
office
record
stay
force
stop
several
light
develop
remember
bit
share
real
answer
sit
figure
letter
decide
language
subject
class
development
town
half
minute
food
break
clear
future
either
ago
per
remain
top
among
win
color
involve
reach
social
period
across
note
history
create
drive
along
type
sound
eye
music
game
political
free
receive
moment
sale
policy
further
body
require
wait
general
appear
toward
team
easy
individual
full
black
sense
perhaps
add
rule
pass
produce
sell
short
agree
law
everything
research
cover
paper
position
near
human
computer
situation
staff
activity
film
morning
war
account
shop
major
someone
above
design
event
special
sometimes
condition
carry
choose
father
decision
table
certain
forward
main
die
bear
cut
describe
himself
available
especially
strong
rise
girl
maybe
community
else
particular
role
join
difficult
please
detail
difference
action
health
eat
step
TRUE
phone
themselves
draw
white
date
practice
model
raise
customer
front
explain
door
outside
behind
economic
site
approach
teacher
land
charge
finally
sign
claim
relationship
travel
enjoy
death
nice
amount
improve
picture
boy
regard
organization
happy
couple
act
range
quality
project
round
opportunity
road
accord
list
wish
therefore
wear
fund
rest
kid
industry
education
measure
kill
serve
likely
certainly
national
itself
teach
field
security
air
benefit
trade
risk
news
standard
vote
percent
focus
stage
space
instead
realize
usually
data
single
address
performance
chance
accept
society
technology
mention
choice
save
common
culture
total
demand
material
limit
listen
due
wrong
foot
effort
attention
upon
check
complete
lie
pick
reduce
personal
ground
animal
arrive
patient
current
century
evidence
exist
similar
fight
leader
fine
street
former
contact
particularly
wife
sport
prepare
discuss
response
voice
piece
finish
suppose
apply
president
fire
compare
court
police
store
poor
knowledge
laugh
arm
heart
source
employee
manage
simply
bank
firm
cell
article
fast
attack
foreign
surprise
feature
factor
pretty
recently
affect
drop
recent
relate
official
financial
miss
art
campaign
private
pause
everyone
forget
page
worry
summer
drink
opinion
park
represent
key
inside
manager
international
contain
notice
wonder
nature
structure
section
myself
exactly
plant
paint
worker
press
whatever
necessary
region
growth
evening
influence
respect
various
catch
thus
skill
attempt
son
simple
medium
average
stock
management
character
bed
hit
establish
indeed
final
economy
fit
guy
function
yesterday
image
size
behavior
addition
determine
station
population
fail
environment
production
contract
player
comment
enter
occur
alone
significant
drug
wall
series
direct
success
tomorrow
director
clearly
lack
review
depend
race
recognize
window
purpose
department
gain
tree
college
argue
board
holiday
mark
church
machine
achieve
item
prove
cent
season
floor
stuff
wide
anyone
method
analysis
election
military
hotel
club
below
movie
doctor
discussion
sorry
challenge
nation
nearly
statement
link
despite
introduce
advantage
ready
marry
strike
mile
seek
ability
unit
card
hospital
quickly
interview
agreement
release
tax
solution
capital
popular
specific
beautiful
fear
aim
television
serious
target
degree
pull
red
husband
access
movement
treat
identify
loss
shall
modern
pressure
bus
treatment
conference
yourself
supply
village
worth
natural
express
indicate
attend
brother
investment
score
organize
trip
beyond
sleep
fish
promise
potential
energy
trouble
relation
touch
file
middle
bar
suffer
strategy
deep
except
clean
tend
advance
fill
star
network
generally
operation
match
avoid
seat
throw
task
normal
goal
associate
blue
positive
option
box
huge
message
instance
style
refer
cold
push
quarter
assume
baby
successful
sing
doubt
competition
theory
propose
reference
argument
adult
fly
document
pattern
application
hot
obviously
unclear
bill
search
separate
central
career
anyway
speech
dog
officer
throughout
oil
dress
profit
guess
fun
protect
resource
science
disease
balance
damage
basis
author
basic
encourage
hair
male
operate
reflect
exercise
useful
restaurant
income
property
previous
dark
imagine
okay
earn
daughter
post
newspaper
define
conclusion
clock
everybody
weekend
perform
professional
mine
debate
memory
green
song
object
maintain
credit
ring
discover
dead
afternoon
prefer
extend
possibility
direction
facility
variety
daily
clothes
screen
track
dance
completely
female
responsibility
original
sister
rock
dream
nor
university
easily
agency
dollar
garden
fix
ahead
cross
yeah
candidate
weight
legal
proposal
version
conversation
somebody
pound
magazine
shape
sea
immediately
welcome
smile
communication
agent
traditional
replace
judge
herself
suddenly
generation
estimate
favorite
difficulty
purchase
shoot
announce
unless
independent
recommend
survey
majority
stick
request
rich
wind
none
exchange
budget
famous
blood
appropriate
block
warm
count
scene
writer
content
prevent
safe
invite
mix
element
effective
correct
medical
admit
beat
telephone
copy
committee
aware
advice
handle
glass
trial
stress
radio
administration
complex
text
context
ride
directly
heavy
remove
conduct
equipment
otherwise
title
extra
executive
chair
expensive
sample
sex
deliver
video
connection
primary
weather
collect
inform
principle
straight
appeal
highly
trust
wonderful
flat
absolutely
flow
fair
additional
responsible
farm
collection
hang
negative
band
relative
tour
alternative
software
pair
ship
attitude
cheap
double
leg
observe
sentence
print
progress
truth
nobody
examine
lay
speed
politics
reply
display
transfer
perfect
slightly
overall
intend
user
respond
dinner
slow
regular
physical
apart
suit
federal
reveal
percentage
peace
status
crime
decline
decade
launch
warn
consumer
favor
dry
partner
institution
spot
horse
eventually
heat
excite
reader
importance
distance
guide
grant
taxi
feed
pain
sector
mistake
ensure
satisfy
chief
cool
expert
wave
south
labor
surface
library
excellent
edge
camp
audience
lift
procedure
email
global
struggle
advertise
select
surround
extent
river
annual
fully
contrast
roll
reality
photograph
artist
conflict
entire
presence
crowd
corner
gas
shift
net
category
secretary
defense
quick
cook
spread
nuclear
scale
driver
ball
cry
introduction
requirement
north
confirm
senior
photo
refuse
transport
emerge
map
concept
island
reform
neither
football
survive
flight
left
solve
neighbor
background
technique
traffic
improvement
tool
consequence
circumstance
smoke
reaction
rain
busy
lesson
brain
mass
funny
contribute
failure
schedule
speaker
bottom
adopt
combine
mountain
waste
hide
marriage
ticket
meal
colleague
bag
repeat
equal
expression
plus
extremely
owner
plane
commercial
lady
duty
strength
connect
cultural
arrange
scheme
payment
unfortunately
brief
bird
demonstrate
contribution
appreciate
chapter
secret
apparently
novel
union
burn
trend
initial
pleasure
suggestion
critical
gather
mostly
earth
pop
essential
desire
promote
currently
employ
path
topic
beach
attract
engage
powerful
flower
crisis
settle
boat
aid
fan
kitchen
twice
fresh
delay
safety
engineer
quiet
insurance
nurse
divide
length
investigation
package
somewhere
expand
commit
obvious
jump
weapon
relatively
host
winter
district
broad
tire
spring
spirit
lunch
actual
pool
battle
tradition
cash
hardly
award
coach
experiment
consideration
strange
code
possibly
threat
accident
impossible
revenue
enable
afraid
active
conclude
religious
cancer
convince
vary
environmental
sun
healthy
blow
volume
location
invest
proceed
wash
actor
glad
tape
whereas
opposite
stone
sum
murder
monitor
soldier
finance
hate
egg
concert
shock
comfortable
usual
carefully
pack
recall
wine
camera
swim
manufacture
theater
cycle
coffee
totally
museum
visitor
freedom
construction
dear
objective
moreover
onto
historical
oppose
branch
vehicle
scientist
route
bind
belong
taste
tonight
fashion
danger
bomb
army
dangerous
decrease
hurt
council
editor
normally
sight
generate
gift
delivery
deny
guest
anybody
bedroom
quote
climb
basically
violence
minister
mainly
mouth
noise
manner
gun
square
occasion
familiar
ignore
destroy
affair
civil
locate
citizen
temperature
gold
domestic
load
belief
troop
technical
remind
arrangement
skin
prison
switch
acquire
corporate
fairly
wood
participate
tough
tear
representative
capacity
border
shake
assessment
shoe
ought
ad
fee
hall
regulation
escape
studio
proper
relax
tourist
component
afford
lawyer
suspect
cup
description
confidence
industrial
complain
perspective
error
arrest
assess
register
asset
signal
finger
relevant
explore
leadership
commitment
wake
necessarily
bright
frame
slowly
bond
hire
hole
tie
internal
chain
literature
victim
threaten
division
secure
amaze
device
birth
forest
label
root
factory
expense
channel
investigate
recommendation
rank
typical
west
friendly
resident
provision
concentrate
plenty
export
entirely
strongly
bridge
consist
graduate
brand
moral
insist
combination
abuse
ice
principal
master
definitely
session
grade
nevertheless
predict
previously
protection
largely
wed
rent
shot
appearance
reasonable
guarantee
till
theme
judgment
odd
approve
loan
definition
elect
atmosphere
farmer
comparison
characteristic
license
rely
narrow
succeed
identity
desk
permit
seriously
wild
empty
commission
unique
association
instrument
investor
practical
tea
lovely